Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
All the whining trump haters here told us for years that Trump was in bed with the Russians and when it is proved otherwise - they flip to "obstruct". Now the definition of obstruct gets changed to fit your narrative. Pure hate from the left.
Obviously trump obstructed, that was made very clear. That little ditty that presidents canmot be indicted while in office needs to change, immediately.
Yes. The longest paragraph of his entire statement was explaining why they didn't charge obstruction.
I think he just wanted to get out in front of everything to avoid being used as a political pawn. "All I'm going to say is in the report". Shaky voice....didn't expect that.
The "the investigation was very important and needed to respond to very serious allegations" seems to be a comment to the whacky rights conspiracy theories.
-Volume 1 conclusion: They had insufficient evidence of conspiracy. So perhaps there was none, but he worded it as they had insufficient evidence.
-Volume 2 conclusion: He did not conclude whether Trump obstructed justice. He didn't charge because DOJ policy says you cannot indict the President.
I think he was clarifying this for those that keep saying "No collusion, no obstruction" because each of the bullet points above are different than "no collusion, no obstruction."
So there's no indictments, which is acceptable because how the Justice Department works. What is not acceptable is people burying their heads in the sand about what is acceptable behavior or having a reasonable debate about what is acceptable behavior.
Also, do you believe the country should fix areas in terms of election interference by Russia? His last statement was that every American should be concerned about that.
So basically he concluded nothing, what a cop out. If he had any evidence of collusion that would of been the first thing in the report, this whole collusion thing was a plot started on planted and false intelligence, paid for by the Clinton camp. Where’s the outrage in that? The media won’t touch it, but it’s getting exposed regardless
So basically he concluded nothing, what a cop out. If he had any evidence of collusion that would of been the first thing in the report, this whole collusion thing was a plot started on planted and false intelligence, paid for by the Clinton camp. Where’s the outrage in that? The media won’t touch it, but it’s getting exposed regardless
You need to face reality: The only reason he was not charged with anything is because he's the president. Sadly, it appears the president can commit crimes and get away with it, just because he has a certain job.
You need to face reality: The only reason he was not charged with anything is because he's the president. Sadly, it appears the president can commit crimes and get away with it, just because he has a certain job.
Yep & I cannot believe that has never
Been changed. President could murder someone & her away with it while in office. Disgusting.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
