Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
do you really think a baby who is a few days old really know or cares about what you call mutilation of his penis when this is not mutilation at all. It is taking a very small amount of foreskin off to help with keeping it clean if nothing else.
Medically questionable procedure.
"Mutilation or maiming (from the Latin: mutilus) is cutting off or injury to a body part of a person so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured."
Ninety percent of American males weren't circumcised until a wacko who made Corn Flakes started spouting off that it helped boys not play with themselves.
“CONCLUSION
In every falsehood there's a kernel of truth. In his fanatical attempt to prevent children from masturbating, did Kellogg advocate circumcising boys? Yes. Was he responsible for the rise of infant circumcision in America? No.”
“CONCLUSION
In every falsehood there's a kernel of truth. In his fanatical attempt to prevent children from masturbating, did Kellogg advocate circumcising boys? Yes. Was he responsible for the rise of infant circumcision in America? No.”
“CONCLUSION
In every falsehood there's a kernel of truth. In his fanatical attempt to prevent children from masturbating, did Kellogg advocate circumcising boys? Yes. Was he responsible for the rise of infant circumcision in America? No.”
I'm not sure how you could prove it one way or the other. There are a lot of events that come about relatively during the same time period. World War One had a big effect as well. It could be post hoc, ergo propter hoc for sure. A lot may have played a role from going from around 10% of the American populace being circumcised in the 1880s to around 90% being circumcised in the 1960s.
This fine individual in New York recommends waiting to perform the circumcision until the boy is "old enough to feel it and realize it." His reasoning? To teach kids that "you have to be willing to spill some blood for allahs sharia." https://www.memri.org/tv/new-york-cl...-allahs-sharia
"Mutilation or maiming (from the Latin: mutilus) is cutting off or injury to a body part of a person so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured."
There are no health benefits for circumcision, its medieval and barbaric, its the 21st Century we should be well past cutting off parts of a mans organ for no reason! At the very least we should be letting the individual themselves decide, god doesn't want people to wear stupid hats, certain clothes or cover their faces! And he certainly doesn't want people slicing off bits of 'other' peoples bodies! Religion is NOT what god wants, its what men THINK god wants, that's why they are so different and so bloody pointless.
Yep. Not once in 38 years of marriage has my husband said “Darn this penis. It would work SO much better if I was uncircumcised”.
What! You're a women! You don't get an opinion on this topic.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
