Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-30-2019, 04:21 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,649,302 times
Reputation: 13053

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
Dear heaven! Are you for real? Anti-life cabal...slice and dice.....eat the baby legally.

WTF is wrong with you?
Must be something wrong with me when I don't want to kill babies....Hummmmm

 
Old 05-30-2019, 04:22 PM
 
1,111 posts, read 1,183,029 times
Reputation: 1320
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post
https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/...ds/1276867001/

This baby is leaving the hospital at 5 lbs while being born premature.

Anyone claiming that at 23 weeks the “fetus” is not a human, is again proven wrong. Unless the baby is sick, the baby is a human being with a brain, heart, other organs, and proven to be able to live.

How can it be right to kill a human while an animal that is premature born, and killed is called “animal abuse!
So at 24 weeks pregnant, the mother can start collecting child support? At 24 weeks, if she's an illegal alien, you can't deport the mother because she's carrying a US Citizen? At 24 weeks the mother can insure the child so if she ends up miscarrying, she can collect?

I'm also curious how you feel about social safety nets for people that are going to essentially have forced birth based on your ideals. Or is this another case of NGAF after the baby is born. A child not fed, not educated, not housed - is not pro-life ... You want / support tax money going to those things?

Just asking, because most the time, people with this POV end up being pro forced birth, not pro-life
 
Old 05-30-2019, 06:33 PM
 
27,214 posts, read 46,741,218 times
Reputation: 15667
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jabronie View Post
So at 24 weeks pregnant, the mother can start collecting child support? At 24 weeks, if she's an illegal alien, you can't deport the mother because she's carrying a US Citizen? At 24 weeks the mother can insure the child so if she ends up miscarrying, she can collect?

I'm also curious how you feel about social safety nets for people that are going to essentially have forced birth based on your ideals. Or is this another case of NGAF after the baby is born. A child not fed, not educated, not housed - is not pro-life ... You want / support tax money going to those things?

Just asking, because most the time, people with this POV end up being pro forced birth, not pro-life
Maybe you should ask all the good people who adopt babies that other people don’t want. Couples who want a baby and can’t get them due to health related issues and are willing to care for the child. Many people adopt from abroad, and some, may have preferred to adopt and help a pregnant woman in the US who doesn’t want her baby.

Maybe you should ask why approx 90%-95% of all abortions, are elective chosen abortions and not medical related, rape or insect cases.

Please think about, why these women and of course since most liberals see everyone as equals or want to make everyone equal, why did these men and women not try to use a rubber or birth control?

Your answer will probably that birth control doesn’t always work and rubbers can break, but that cant be that high percentage.
 
Old 05-30-2019, 06:55 PM
 
Location: New Mexico
4,796 posts, read 2,800,346 times
Reputation: 4926
Default Let the buyer beware

Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post
Maybe you should ask all the good people who adopt babies that other people don’t want. Couples who want a baby and can’t get them due to health related issues and are willing to care for the child. Many people adopt from abroad, and some, may have preferred to adopt and help a pregnant woman in the US who doesn’t want her baby.


Ah, well, there you have it. With 100,000+ children (& young adults - some of these kids have been in & out of adoptions, placements, & Divisions of Families & Children several times) in the US awaiting adoption, it must be that there's a shortage of good people in the US. Who'd've thunk, hm?

Apparently adoptive parents can be fairly picky about who they want, & the children of drug &/or alcohol addicts are particularly hard to place. It's not the kid's fault - but if they were exposed to highly addictive drugs while in utero, it vastly complicates their possible placement in a permanent home.
 
Old 05-30-2019, 10:26 PM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,253,872 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtovenice View Post
The USA as a whole, not state by state, has one of the worst records of maternal care in 1st world countries.

That doesn't mean, well, let's kill as many babies as we can. Because they will get bad care anyway. /faceplant/
Nobody's "killing babies" in the first place.

Why force women to bring more life into the world when we're doing such a poor job of tending to the ones already here?
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
 
Old 05-30-2019, 10:27 PM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,253,872 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2mares View Post
In the video the nurses repeatedly called it a miracle.
Because it basically was.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
 
Old 05-30-2019, 10:30 PM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,253,872 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtovenice View Post
Do OBGYNs ask their pregnant patients if they want an abortion?

Is this part of regular OBGYN "care"?
Of course not. But, if a woman wants an abortion, a decent doctor recommends a clinic if they don't perform them.

Also, a good doctor does not judge. A good doctor also saves a pregnant woman's life with an early termination if her life is at risk. Because the PREGNANT WOMAN is the OB-GYN's patient. The only time the baby is actually the patient is during delivery and immediately after. From that point on, the baby that is delivered becomes the pediatrician's patient.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
 
Old 05-30-2019, 10:32 PM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,253,872 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtovenice View Post
Do OB-GYNs do an ultrasound in one room of a baby, congratulate the new mom, then go into another room with a different patient and kill a baby that is the same gestation age, telling the mother that it's just a clump of cells?
Typically, ultrasounds for women who are pregnant and happy about it are generally met with a show of congratulations on the part of the attending physician, yes.

And, typically, ultrasounds for women who are pregnant and NOT happy about it, or who are pregnant and carrying a fetus that is not thriving, dying, or already dead aren't happy occasions and physicians with any sort of decent bedside manner offer condolences, concern, and options.

I'm surprised you could not suss that out for yourself.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
 
Old 05-30-2019, 10:36 PM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,253,872 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post
Maybe you should ask all the good people who adopt babies that other people don’t want. Couples who want a baby and can’t get them due to health related issues and are willing to care for the child. Many people adopt from abroad, and some, may have preferred to adopt and help a pregnant woman in the US who doesn’t want her baby.

Maybe you should ask why approx 90%-95% of all abortions, are elective chosen abortions and not medical related, rape or insect cases.

Please think about, why these women and of course since most liberals see everyone as equals or want to make everyone equal, why did these men and women not try to use a rubber or birth control?

Your answer will probably that birth control doesn’t always work and rubbers can break, but that cant be that high percentage.
Hold up... you want to force a woman to carry a pregnancy for about 40 weeks so she can give someone else a baby?

What are we, brood mares?

What if the woman who is pregnant is forced to carry to delivery, then sees the baby who is born and decides she has put a lot of work into carrying it so she wants to keep it?

She and the baby can die in a ditch because "no support for welfare moms!" or something?

Cannot have it both ways.

Either you are pro LIFE or you are not.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
 
Old 05-30-2019, 10:38 PM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,253,872 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by southwest88 View Post
Ah, well, there you have it. With 100,000+ children (& young adults - some of these kids have been in & out of adoptions, placements, & Divisions of Families & Children several times) in the US awaiting adoption, it must be that there's a shortage of good people in the US. Who'd've thunk, hm?

Apparently adoptive parents can be fairly picky about who they want, & the children of drug &/or alcohol addicts are particularly hard to place. It's not the kid's fault - but if they were exposed to highly addictive drugs while in utero, it vastly complicates their possible placement in a permanent home.
A lot of this forced birth stuff is designed to try to force more white women to produce offspring that will wind up in the system and increase the number that are born to moms who don't do drugs, really.

Most of the kids who are babies in the system are nonwhite and/or born to moms with drug problems.

And, people don't want to adopt older kids.

So, yeah... "pro life" and all.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top