Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-03-2019, 07:09 AM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,422,948 times
Reputation: 6409

Advertisements

If Democrats and Independents turn out as they did in 2012 and 2018, it's over for Individual 1. Many voters stayed home in 2016.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-03-2019, 07:23 AM
 
2,561 posts, read 2,183,566 times
Reputation: 1672
Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress View Post

Why do you think Trump campaigned so hard for Repub Senate candidates? The dirty little secret the Dems are hiding from their uneducated zombies is they need the Senate to convict. Their uneducated base don't know what happened to Bill Clinton (actually charged with eleven real crimes). He had a good economy like Trump does and impeachment only fired up his base during re-election while the Repubs suffered. The same will happen in reverse..
This isn't a dirty little secret at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2019, 07:25 AM
 
2,561 posts, read 2,183,566 times
Reputation: 1672
Quote:
Originally Posted by case44 View Post
Keeping illegal aliens from voting needs to addressed, or else, we may have a ton of voter fraud potentially going the other way.
Do you have a source for this that isn't Breitbart or Trump's twitter feed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2019, 07:33 AM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,472,102 times
Reputation: 9435
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallbuilder View Post
Recent poll had him down 11% versus Biden in PA. Sure, he was polling 3-5% down versus Hillary in the Rust Belt and won it by 2-3%, fewer voters than can fit in an average football stadium from 4 states combined, and polling data could be off again in 2020, but it would have to be off by a large factor.

You can't really compare Trump to Obama, Bush II or Clinton, who won 2nd terms without too much trouble.

Clinton was completely bipartisan, could get the party-line Democrats plus the Republicans who controlled a Congress that got along with Clinton. He won in a landslide.

Bush was still riding his 80%+ approval rating from Afghanistan and Iraq, neither of which had become onpopular yet.

Obama had 97% of Black vote in large quantities in swing states plus enough of the rest of his voting block. Republicans didn't have an exciting candidate who could rise as leader. Union bosses in the Rust Belt said vote Obama again.

Trump? Clearly he's the leader of a new Republican party brand that he created. But, how much of his brand was his running against Crooked Hillary? I think a lot. He can't run on his brand anymore.
Being a former member of the USWA I can tell you that we had no union "bosses" and it`s quite likely that NRA bosses had as much or more influence on the vote from steelworkers than the union did. That`s a little bit off topic but I just wanted to clear that up. I walked the walk for 35 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2019, 07:41 AM
 
2,561 posts, read 2,183,566 times
Reputation: 1672
Quote:
Originally Posted by aileesic View Post
The base seems to vote looks + Hollywood/entertainment connections + anything goes.
Ronald Reagan was an actor. Trump had a TV show.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aileesic View Post
Majority of white Americans with any sort of political conscience will vote Trump and I don't have to be one to know that.
What?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aileesic View Post
Plus, there aren't enough blacks to make a difference in the 2020 elections and will never be again.
If the African American vote stayed at Obama's levels for Hillary, only Pennsylvania would've been the difference maker in 2016. Wisconsin and Michigan would've gone to Hillary.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aileesic View Post
Plus, there aren't enough blacks to make a difference in the 2020 elections and will never be again. Yes, there will be leftover social programs in the near future but will be mostly gone by the time 2038 comes around. By then, those needing them will be dead or pulled out of the mainstream in some way, the black population will be around 4-5% or lots less, Hispanics will either shoot upwards around 18-20% or downwards to less than 10%.
What point are you trying to make here?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aileesic View Post
...Hispanics will either shoot upwards around 18-20% or downwards to less than 10%. But remember Hispanics are white. Everyone else will simply go about their business in a rolling, thriving economy.
What point(s) are you trying to make here?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2019, 07:43 AM
 
11,523 posts, read 14,659,169 times
Reputation: 16821
I see this election as close as any election ever recorded. T will probably lose by one or two states and by very, very small margins.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2019, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,834 posts, read 17,106,096 times
Reputation: 11535
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallbuilder View Post
Recent poll had him down 11% versus Biden in PA. Sure, he was polling 3-5% down versus Hillary in the Rust Belt and won it by 2-3%, fewer voters than can fit in an average football stadium from 4 states combined, and polling data could be off again in 2020, but it would have to be off by a large factor..
These are the polls brought to you by the same people who gave us Mueller and all the rest. Use your noggin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2019, 07:53 AM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,095,474 times
Reputation: 9726
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
These are the polls brought to you by the same people who gave us Mueller and all the rest. Use your noggin.
^And this comment is brought to us by the same guy who predicted that Paul Manafort would be acquitted on all counts. Use with a grain of salt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2019, 07:55 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallbuilder View Post
Recent poll had him down 11% versus Biden in PA. Sure, he was polling 3-5% down versus Hillary in the Rust Belt and won it by 2-3%, fewer voters than can fit in an average football stadium from 4 states combined, and polling data could be off again in 2020, but it would have to be off by a large factor.

You can't really compare Trump to Obama, Bush II or Clinton, who won 2nd terms without too much trouble.

Clinton was completely bipartisan, could get the party-line Democrats plus the Republicans who controlled a Congress that got along with Clinton. He won in a landslide.

Bush was still riding his 80%+ approval rating from Afghanistan and Iraq, neither of which had become onpopular yet.

Obama had 97% of Black vote in large quantities in swing states plus enough of the rest of his voting block. Republicans didn't have an exciting candidate who could rise as leader. Union bosses in the Rust Belt said vote Obama again.

Trump? Clearly he's the leader of a new Republican party brand that he created. But, how much of his brand was his running against Crooked Hillary? I think a lot. He can't run on his brand anymore.



Bill Clinton once said, "It is the economy, stupid."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2019, 08:35 AM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,472,102 times
Reputation: 9435
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Bill Clinton once said, "It is the economy, stupid."
And voters know that the economy was doing well before Trump.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ad/3756886002/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top