Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-05-2019, 04:07 PM
 
Location: No Mask For Me This Time, Either
5,660 posts, read 5,087,879 times
Reputation: 6086

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by travis t View Post
The shooter used extended clips which are a basic assault-style implement. It was all over the news. If he had had an AR-15 he might have been spotted at the gate and stopped. With the handgun, he had the element of surprise. I think this shows why we need to ban assault weapons AND handguns.
Can you explain what you mean by "extended clips"? Excepting revolvers, most of my handguns came with magazines which hold 15, 17 or 19 rounds. If this is standard as supplied by the manufacturer, what do you mean by "extended"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by travis t View Post
Any weapon designed for mass slaughter belongs in the hands of police and military ONLY.
I once saw a movie where only the police and military had guns...

Quote:
Originally Posted by biggunsmallbrains View Post
So using your “evidence”, 32,000 plus people die every year by guns and only 4% are justified.

Thanks for backing up my point with that “evidence.” Hey, 96% of gun deaths being unjustified can’t get much worse at least.
2/3 of gun-inflicted deaths in recent years are due to suicide - freely-chosen and self-inflicted. That doesn't fit the agenda though, does it?

And what do you propose to do about thugs killing thugs as mentioned in the graphic? Should we even care about those or count them as lamentable?

 
Old 06-06-2019, 04:44 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14274
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZUMAN View Post
Libs and their MSM friends ignore discussing and reporting Chicago crime like the plague.
And not only Chi.
 
Old 06-06-2019, 04:50 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14274
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
That poster evidently thinks we should be scanning backpacks at elementary schools, maybe some pat downs and body cavity searches. Going to Home Depot? We'll need to have a dog sniff your truck "just in case".

The line to get in to eat anywhere would be genuine under that poster's ideal. Take off your shoes, maybe strip down to your underwear.

Ok You are good to enter.

"That poster evidently thinks we should be scanning backpacks at elementary schools,"


Actually some DO. There is a private school, grade school through high school, in the heart of crime ridden Wash. D.C that has been doing it for several years. They also control the entry points and have VOLUNTEERED ARMED school personnel who go through extensive training and continual training throughout the year.
 
Old 06-06-2019, 04:55 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14274
Quote:
Originally Posted by NVplumber View Post
And I have to ask, the COPS need to have weapons of "mass slaughter?" Now that is some crazy s***. At any rate I say if the cops can have it the people bloody sure can. They patrol 8 hours a day, we live out here. And it has been totally proven over and over again that we cannot depend on the cops to protect us.


They just bring the ME and the body bags. Clean up crew. As it's been said "when seconds count the police are only minutes away." In many cases more than minutes. And in support of my position that if the cops have certain weapons the citizens can have the same it bears saying that cops are not special. They are citizens just like us. The badge doesn't make them some sort of royalty.


They are just a supplementary security force. We the People are the first line of defense.
"we need to ban assault weapons"


I'd bet he doesn't even know what an "assault weapon" is!
 
Old 06-06-2019, 05:01 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ex New Yorker View Post
That's because he/she has no argument. Especially when it's proven that something they support is a complete failure except in the most extreme circumstance.

Indeed it is completely insane to suggest doing the same for every public building or even private places that are posted as "gun free zones". Realistically what are the odds that anyone of us will become a victim of a mass shooting?

To put things into perspective, I did a little research. In shootings involving four or more victims in the US and with a population of 330,000,000 people your odds of being killed in one is infinitesimal. You stand a better chance of being struck by lightning or being killed in a motor vehicle accident or drowning.

87 people were killed in the Happyland Fire in 1990 in which what was a dollars worth of gas at the time, a container and match was the weapon of choice. That's 28 more than what Paddock killed with a bunch of AR 15's equipped with bump stocks firing into a crowd of thousands from a hotel room.

Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths | VitalSigns | CDC
https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/motor...ety/index.html
More than 32,000 people are killed and 2 million are injured each year from motor vehicle crashes.

Unintentional Drowning Deaths in the United States, 1999–2010
www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db149.htm
A total of 46,419 people died from unintentional drowning in the United States from 1999 through 2010, an average of 3,868 deaths per year.
Look at what Mcvey managed to do WITHOUT FIRING A SHOT!


"Timothy James McVeigh (April 23, 1968 – June 11, 2001) was an American domestic terrorist who perpetrated the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, which killed 168 people and injured over 680 others."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh

We can STILL buy the products he used.
 
Old 06-06-2019, 05:05 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14274
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggunsmallbrains View Post
Lol. Archie has taught me a lot about the mindset of many on the right. Is it coincidental that both Archie and Trump are from Queens? “Case closed.”
"Is it coincidental that both Archie and Trump are from Queens?" “Case closed
"smallbrains"
Not surprised someone like you would think Archie was a REAL person!“ Case closed"
 
Old 06-06-2019, 05:08 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14274
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggunsmallbrains View Post
The murders of Chris Kyle and Chad Littlefield occurred on February 2, 2013, at a shooting range near Chalk Mountain, Texas. Former Navy SEAL Chris Kyle, 38, and Chad Littlefield, 35, were both killed by Eddie Ray Routh, a 25-year old Marine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder...ad_Littlefield

Post fail. Enjoy crow.
The question asked was, "
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez
How often are there intentional shootings at gun ranges?"

NO claim was made that it NEVER HAPPENS!

Post fail. Enjoy crow!


Maybe you need a reading comprehension course!
 
Old 06-06-2019, 05:21 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14274
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggunsmallbrains View Post
If you have accidental shootings, along with homicides, in a environment that’s supposed to be regulated well, like a shooting range, then what do you think also happens outside that environment every single day in this country?

Nearly 40,000 People Died From Guns in U.S. Last Year, Highest in 50 Years
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/18/us/gun-deaths.html

That’s 110 deaths a day, equivalent to a small town dying every day. Almost 5 deaths an hour. Actually someone probably died from a gun death during this post.

The fact is people have died, whether accidentally or not at gun ranges. This directly contradicts the previous assertions that things like this don’t happen at gun ranges... because they do.
"Criminologist and researcher Gary Kleck, using his own commissioned phone surveys and number extrapolation, estimates that Americans use guns for defensive purposes 1.2 million times each year — and that 1 in 6 Americans who have used guns defensively believe someone would have died but for their ability to resort to their defensive use of firearms."

https://www.investors.com/politics/c...trollers-care/

"If those states which did not have right-to-carry concealed gun provisions had adopted them in 1992, approximately 1,570 murders; 4,177 rapes; and over 60,000 aggravated assaults would have been avoided yearly."

https://www.investors.com/politics/c...trollers-care/


So, you DON'T CARE if these people had been killed because they did NOT have gun to defend themselves?
 
Old 06-06-2019, 05:23 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nanny Goat View Post
Governor is trying for common sense gun laws, not trying to take away any person's 2nd ammend. rights.
"Governor is trying for common sense gun laws,"
Depends on what your definition of "common sense" is!
 
Old 06-06-2019, 05:26 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nanny Goat View Post
Governor is trying for common sense gun laws, not trying to take away any person's 2nd ammend. rights.
"Governor is trying for common sense gun laws,"
Depends on what your definition of "common sense" is!


Out of the over 20,000 existing gun laws, how many have actually STOPPED a gun crime from being committed.


"When you do the same thing over and over, do NOT expect a DIFFERENT outcome!"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top