Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-08-2019, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,335,750 times
Reputation: 8828

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
LOL, Hillary claimed she didn't know what the "C" stood for and she did break the law. Why did she feel the need to have a secret server in the first place. As soon as an enemy would find out, and they will, that server would be a target for hacking into. Hillary broke the law.

I can't believe her supporters bought the BS. It's only one of the reasons I wouldn't vote for her. She thinks she is above the law and there is no telling what else she would try to get away with.
Yet another level on the right wing BS...

Two of the three documents with the "c" were incorrect. So we are talking that she may have missed one "c" in 100,000 or so documents. That is simply absurd.

And again the Trump regime has already moved heaven and earth trying to find something. Notice how successful they have been?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-08-2019, 12:10 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,719,480 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
Yet another level on the right wing BS...

Two of the three documents with the "c" were incorrect. So we are talking that she may have missed one "c" in 100,000 or so documents. That is simply absurd.

And again the Trump regime has already moved heaven and earth trying to find something. Notice how successful they have been?
“When asked what the parenthetical ‘C’ meant before a paragraph within the captioned email, [Clinton] stated she did not know and could only speculate it was referencing paragraphs marked in alphabetical order,” read the FBI’s notes.

https://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...dential-i-take
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2019, 12:13 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,719,480 times
Reputation: 13868
for anyone with a security clearance, but it was totally lacking in credibility for someone with her proven pattern of deceit.

Clinton has repeatedly changed her story: First, she told us there was “no classified material” in her private emails (which the FBI says was untrue). Then she told us there was nothing “classified at the time” (which the FBI also says was also untrue). Finally, she told us there was nothing “marked classified” in her private emails (which the FBI says was also untrue). So now she tells FBI interviewers that she does not know what (C) means, and they believe her?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.2ec57334adc3
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2019, 01:27 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,335,750 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
“When asked what the parenthetical ‘C’ meant before a paragraph within the captioned email, [Clinton] stated she did not know and could only speculate it was referencing paragraphs marked in alphabetical order,” read the FBI’s notes.

https://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...dential-i-take
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
for anyone with a security clearance, but it was totally lacking in credibility for someone with her proven pattern of deceit.

Clinton has repeatedly changed her story: First, she told us there was “no classified material” in her private emails (which the FBI says was untrue). Then she told us there was nothing “classified at the time” (which the FBI also says was also untrue). Finally, she told us there was nothing “marked classified” in her private emails (which the FBI says was also untrue). So now she tells FBI interviewers that she does not know what (C) means, and they believe her?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.2ec57334adc3
Still more?

The FBI has no authority to determine what is classified in the State Dept or elsewhere. They never claimed to. They used the opinion of other agencies who also had no authority to classify state dept documents.

Clinton had such authority. If she said it was not classified it was not classified.

And if she virtually never saw a "c" in her emails it is quite possible she did not recall or know its meaning.

Face it. The entire Trump organization could not find a chargeable offense but you can do it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top