Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) will hold a panel discussion, COVID 19: A Second Opinion. A group of world-renowned doctors and medical experts will provide a different perspective on the global pandemic response, the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy, and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.
Moderator: Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.)
Medical experts and doctors
Four Pillars of Pandemic Response
Dr. Peter McCullough
Pillar 1: Limit the spread
Dr. Bret Weinstein
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
Pillar 2: Early at Home Treatment
Dr. Ryan Cole
Dr. Harvey Risch
Dr. George Fareed
Dr. Pierre Kory
Dr. Richard Urso
Pillar 3: Hospital Treatment
Dr. Paul Marik
Dr. Aaron Kheriaty
Pillar 4: Vaccines
Dr. Robert Malone
Dr. David Wiseman
WHAT: Panel discussion on the global pandemic response, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term. The panel will also discuss censorship from Big Tech and the mainstream media, pandemic response effect on children, and vaccine mandate impact on worker shortage.
WHEN: Monday, Jan. 24, 9 a.m. – 12 p.m. ET
WHERE: Russell Senate Office Building, Kennedy Caucus Room 325
Sounds like a select group of anti-vaxers and skeptics, what does he expect will come of this other than claims that the vaccine is bad for you.
Quote:
Several of the announced speakers for the "Defeat the Mandates" event are due to provide information at Johnson's discussion. It is not an official U.S. Senate hearing.
Among those scheduled to speak at both events is Robert Malone, an infectious disease researcher who has claimed to be an "inventor" of mRNA vaccines and has been accused of spreading misinformation about the vaccines that got him booted off Twitter.
Also expected to speak at both events is Texas cardiologist Peter McCullough, who has asserted COVID-19 vaccines are unsafe; Aaron Kheriaty, a University of California-Irvine School of Medicine physician who was fired for refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccine; and Wisconsin physician Pierre Kory, who has promoted the use of ivermectin as an early treatment for COVID-19.
Hey, what do doctors, scientists and those that have spent a lifetime in healthcare actually know? We all know the only true experts are government bureaucrats and media personalities, not doctors and scientists.
Isn't it important to here all sides of an argument to form a sound opinion?
Some of the statements made should disqualify them like when Malone claims Ivermectin could have saved 50,000 lives or McCullough who said vaccines are unsafe all without proof. Missing is the other side who are pro-vaccine.
"In the world of science, there are not two sides to every story – there are scientific truths, and it’s not a matter of balance but rather a matter of perspective. And sometimes when reporters follow this mantra of showing two sides of a story when only one side is supported by science, they can do harm."
Politicians are doing harm, too.
There are no vaccine experts in the vaccine list in the OP. Was Dr. Offit invited? Dr. Gregory Poland? Dr. Peter Hotez?
Even if you think it is "important to [hear] all sides of an argument" it is hard to do that when all of the participants advocate only one "side".
It's terrible that there are some that want to collect information from all sides.
Collecting unbiased information is the most biased way to collect information.
I mean, how dare they include those who aren't paid directly or indirectly off big pharma or government grants!!!
They are all complete quacks anyway, I mean NONE of them are doctors or researchers and none have never seen or treatment patients themselves. They are complete idiots.
"In the world of science, there are not two sides to every story – there are scientific truths, and it’s not a matter of balance but rather a matter of perspective. And sometimes when reporters follow this mantra of showing two sides of a story when only one side is supported by science, they can do harm."
Politicians are doing harm, too.
There are no vaccine experts in the vaccine list in the OP. Was Dr. Offit invited? Dr. Gregory Poland? Dr. Peter Hotez?
Even if you think it is "important to [hear] all sides of an argument" it is hard to do that when all of the participants advocate only one "side".
U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) will hold a panel discussion, COVID 19: A Second Opinion. A group of world-renowned doctors and medical experts will provide a different perspective on the global pandemic response, the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy, and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.
It helps to know what the thread is about.
I suppose if they had a women's oncology conference, people would be mad that infectious disease in the pediatric population wasn't included.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
