Bernie Sanders doesn't know the difference between 'revenue' and 'profit' !!! Anyone want him to make economic policy ? (Congress, independent)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Bernie also doesn't know much about what its like to work in the private sector and pay your bills on time. He is a career politician whose personal life before public office was a train wreck.
Bernie only knows what profits are when he is getting them from his investments, real estate, stocks, speaking fees, book deals etc. All while IN OFFICE.
Bernie only knows what profits are when he is getting them from his investments, real estate, stocks, speaking fees, book deals etc. All while IN OFFICE.
Not saying this is good, but why is it you look the other way when Trump and his cabinet members are making millions last year running their businesses - while also IN OFFICE?
Not saying this is good, but why is it you look the other way when Trump and his cabinet members are making millions last year running their businesses - while also IN OFFICE?
Yes it is strange -congress gives away trillions(last give away foreign aide 850 billion 2019)to those who hate us and trump makes millions and the CDF posters shame him
We are not on the same page are we
Last edited by Huckleberry3911948; 06-19-2019 at 08:54 AM..
Bernie Sanders doesn't know the difference between 'revenue' and 'profit' !!! Anyone want him to make economic policy ? Sanders confuses 'revenue' and 'profit' as he rails for unionization of video game industry https://www.foxnews.com/politics/san...-game-industry
This isn’t the first time Sanders appears to have confused revenue of a company with profit for making a political point.
I am glad FOX found some "news" to report. I assume this is a front page story.
I'm missing the controversy here. He is arguing that any business making $43 billion deserves to have the workers unionized. You can disagree if you want but there is nothing wrong with the argument itself.
I understand that my example is an extreme but it would make the point. They take in $43 billion, pay the CEO and upper managers $30 billion, they have $12 billion in costs and pay the workers $1 billion.
They would argue there is no profit. Maybe not but there is plenty to go around.
I'm missing the controversy here. He is arguing that any business making $43 billion deserves to have the workers unionized. You can disagree if you want but there is nothing wrong with the argument itself.
I understand that my example is an extreme but it would make the point. They take in $43 billion, pay the CEO and upper managers $30 billion, they have $12 billion in costs and pay the workers $1 billion.
They would argue there is no profit. Maybe not but there is plenty to go around.
lets see...do we want pknuckle and comrade bern managing the funds or the people that actually made the money? its a really tough call
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.