Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-27-2019, 06:40 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,173 posts, read 26,197,836 times
Reputation: 27914

Advertisements

Using only your topic heading since your first post stated something different…
"Putting aside the debate about whether AGW is real or not, what is the solution to climate change?"
Reply..patience
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-27-2019, 06:42 AM
 
Location: Posting from my space yacht.
8,447 posts, read 4,751,235 times
Reputation: 15354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler View Post
Well that's a god point, our Climate Alarmists don't mind the Chinese ramping up their carbon emissions because they are good Communists.
Yeah the west has already decreased it's emissions greatly from a generation ago. the decision to give developing nations a pass on many of the restrictions is based on economic justice not environmental concerns, and if we're accepting AGW claims at face value, we should be beyond that point. The crisis itself doesn't care about economic justice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2019, 06:42 AM
 
6,393 posts, read 4,114,442 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogue Mahone View Post
For the purposes of this thread, AGW is real and it's reality goes unchallenged. What can we do to stop it, or slow it down? Or at least mitigate the effects of it? If climate change alarmists had their way completely, carte blanche to do whatever they want, what would they do?
Nothing. We already passed the point of no return.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2019, 06:43 AM
 
4,540 posts, read 2,784,951 times
Reputation: 4921
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd View Post
If the Climate change Alarmists got their way we would have the Green New Deal.



What gets me about all this rubbish is that here in the states we are banning plastic bags, cups and drinking straws yet in half the developing countries in the world they dump their trash right into the ocean or into the nearby river that leads to the ocean.

America is doing a pretty good job of limiting our carbon and trash footprint but it is the rest of the world that needs to catch up. The main problem is of course that the planet has too many people on it.
America still is still higher in CO2 emissions per capita. I always thought it was kind of elitist that Americans would say the Chinese are polluting too much - their per capita emissions are lower. I don't blame the average Chinese person for wanting a car or a washer/dryer, don't we all want that? By the way, China is much further along than the US regarding some green technologies like electric cars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2019, 06:44 AM
 
Location: Posting from my space yacht.
8,447 posts, read 4,751,235 times
Reputation: 15354
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroWord View Post
Nothing. We already passed the point of no return.
In that case we would still have to adapt to it, wouldn't we? That would require some sort of action on our part.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2019, 06:46 AM
 
4,540 posts, read 2,784,951 times
Reputation: 4921
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogue Mahone View Post
Yeah the west has already decreased it's emissions greatly from a generation ago. the decision to give developing nations a pass on many of the restrictions is based on economic justice not environmental concerns, and if we're accepting AGW claims at face value, we should be beyond that point. The crisis itself doesn't care about economic justice.
Why don't we focus on reducing emissions here first? Makes no sense to punish a country like Kenya for building a coal power plant when a third of the country still has no electricity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2019, 06:47 AM
 
6,393 posts, read 4,114,442 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogue Mahone View Post
In that case we would still have to adapt to it, wouldn't we? That would require some sort of action on our part.
Yes, we will adapt to it. The free market will take care of that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2019, 06:47 AM
 
18,447 posts, read 8,272,093 times
Reputation: 13778
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drewjdeg View Post
America still is still higher in CO2 emissions per capita. .
Dear Santa.....our neighbors have a bigger family than we do.....why do we have to stop putting arsenic in the water....when they get to put even more arsenic in the water

...obviously, arsenic is not a poison after all
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2019, 06:50 AM
 
Location: Posting from my space yacht.
8,447 posts, read 4,751,235 times
Reputation: 15354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drewjdeg View Post
Why don't we focus on reducing emissions here first? Makes no sense to punish a country like Kenya for building a coal power plant when a third of the country still has no electricity.
Putting aside the fact that we've already reduced our emissions by a lot, AGW would affect the planet not just the region. Carbon dioxide would be pumped in to the global atmosphere so why does it matter where the coal power plant is built? Giving Kenya a pass is not an environmental consideration, and we're at a crisis point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2019, 06:51 AM
 
7,800 posts, read 4,400,201 times
Reputation: 9438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogue Mahone View Post
For the purposes of this thread, AGW is real and it's reality goes unchallenged. What can we do to stop it, or slow it down? Or at least mitigate the effects of it? If climate change alarmists had their way completely, carte blanche to do whatever they want, what would they do?

The last sentence is actually just gratuitous and opinionated. Your initial questions were clear in themselves.


Other than that, your question is a fair one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top