Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The one thing that I would say was the "mistake" that FOX did is pretty unconvincing to me. Why would they even have the placard to display her death kicking around with those dates on it in the first place?
Why haven't we seen her in an interview since her coming out of surgery? You'd think someone so celebrated by the left would have news stations aching to get her on an interview for the world to see she is indeed alive and well, and get her comments on beating the cancer that almost took her out.
It's always been fishy.
Quote:
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is no longer “converting oxygen to carbon dioxide” aka “dead” according to one of the Navy Intel sources of Daniel Lee. Daniel just reported new information from a Naval Intelligence source that does not surprise me at all and would confirm my own gut feelings. He shows the email from the source in the video. Basically the deep state orchestrated another huge fraud just like Sandy Hook. The source says Ginsburg died when Fox News originally showed the graphic of her passing earlier this year before retracting it as a mistake!
The one thing that I would say was the "mistake" that FOX did is pretty unconvincing to me. Why would they even have the placard to display her death kicking around with those dates on it in the first place?
Because they have it queued up for when she does die and someone hit the wrong "button". Undoubtedly they have it ready for anyone that is well known and old if not everyone.
Actually, any DOUBLE would be a huge improvement over that Constitution Hater.
Exactly. The four dissenters in the Knick v. Township of Scott ruling (Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, Sotomayor) COMPLETELY FAILED to acknowledge and uphold the 5th Amendment Right to 'just compensation' when the government takes private property and declares that it's available to the public for use for free.
The NY Times is equally guilty in refusing to recognize and acknowledge clearly enumerated Constitutional Rights. It's disgusting as hell.
Quote:
"The New York Times focused more attention on the four dissenting Justices, who worried that federal courts will be opened up to a flood of new lawsuits from property owners who were denied compensation."
SHAME, SHAME, SHAME on Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor for COMPLETELY FAILING to recognize, acknowledge and "support and defend the US Constitution" as they SWORE AN OATH to do when they were appointed to the US Supreme Court.
The one thing that I would say was the "mistake" that FOX did is pretty unconvincing to me. Why would they even have the placard to display her death kicking around with those dates on it in the first place?
Why haven't we seen her in an interview since her coming out of surgery? You'd think someone so celebrated by the left would have news stations aching to get her on an interview for the world to see she is indeed alive and well, and get her comments on beating the cancer that almost took her out.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
