Republican Short Circuits Ocasio-Cortez with his Knowledge of the Law (attorney, 9/11)

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by phma

So what !!! Its a crime !!! The first thing they do when entering illegally is a crime !!! Get a clue !!!

Its not as serious as when they kill a citizen creating a life long separation !!! Still its a crime !!!

Enforce the law and stop the more serious crimes against citizens !!!

I've quoted the law and posted the law. They have up to a year to legally apply for asylum regardless of how they got here.

You seem to want to pick and choose laws to enforce. Pretty common.

[T-310]

Originally Posted by pknopp

Crossing the border illegally does not have anything to do with applying for Asylum

To apply for Asylum, file a Form I-589, Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal, within one year of your arrival to the United States.

https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/r...-asylum/asylum

Unless you are placed in removal proceedings following a conviction for illegal entry.

[T-310]

Originally Posted by sickofnyc

But he lied weaseled and misled. The Congresswoman had him dead to rights and he was a resentful belligerent toad.

She fished for an answer and she had her ass handed to her. Why she stuttered in confusion before moving onto another witness.

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by T-310

Unless you are placed in removal proceedings following a conviction for illegal entry.

That's way down the line. I've already covered that so I don't understand the point of bringing it up again.

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by T-310

She fished for an answer and she had her ass handed to her. Why she stuttered in confusion before moving onto another witness.

It was a simple question. "Did you advocate for the separation policy"? If it's something good and something he supports why didn't he simply answer "yes"?

[Retroit]

Originally Posted by sickofnyc

He sounded like jerk. Seeking asylum is not in violation of the law.

Seig Heil Heir Drumpf!!

“In 1939, German asylum seekers sought refuge in Czechoslovakia.” -liberal rewrite of history

[T-310]

Originally Posted by pknopp

That's way down the line. I've already covered that so I don't understand the point of bringing it up again.

Once convicted, they are placed into removal proceedings. An NTA (Notice to Appear) is issued. That happens automatically. Any asylum claim will be rejected. We covered this before. Nothing happens way down the line.

If they try to file asylum before the conviction, the asylum claim is thrown out when placed in removal proceedings.

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by T-310

Once convicted, they are placed into removal proceedings. An NTA (Notice to Appear) is issued. That happens automatically. Any asylum claim will be rejected. We covered this before. Nothing happens way down the line.

That's not how it works. I've provided the actual laws and circumstances.

[T-310]

Originally Posted by pknopp

It was a simple question. "Did you advocate for the separation policy"? If it's something good and something he supports why didn't he simply answer "yes"?

It’s a gotcha question. Children are not put in jail with the parents. Homan answered the question spoiling AOCs gotcha moment.

[T-310]

Originally Posted by pknopp

That's not how it works. I've provided the actual laws and circumstances.

That is how it works. I used to do that type of work. Before I went to the private sector.