Republican Short Circuits Ocasio-Cortez with his Knowledge of the Law (wage, hiring illegals)

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by Rakin

They are not seeking Asylum. They are seeking jobs and welfare here in the US.

Illegals do not qualify for welfare. I've argued many years that we need to hit the employers that hire them and hit them hard.

[T-310]

Originally Posted by pknopp

I've posted it here many times. I'm positive you have seen it. On my phone. Not that it matters. You've seen it.

I asked before (with no answer so far). What other international laws are proposing to over ride US laws?

It will be difficult for those crossed illegally to claim asylum because they will be placed in removal proceedings. Those in removal proceedings are barred from filing asylum claims.

[DRob4JC]

Originally Posted by pknopp

If he hadn't she wouldn't have had to ask over and over.

She was looking for a specific answer - that he was responsible for separating families, so she could browbeat him for being a terrible human being.

She just wanted to get the answer she wanted. Forget the law - give me my answer so that I am better than you.

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by T-310

It will be difficult for those crossed illegally to claim asylum because they will be placed in removal proceedings. Those in removal proceedings are barred from filing asylum claims.

"Removal proceedings". Lol. The system is, hearing, release.

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by DRob4JC

She was looking for a specific answer - that he was responsible for separating families, so she could browbeat him for being a terrible human being.

She just wanted to get the answer she wanted. Forget the law - give me my answer so that I am better than you.

She asked him if it was his recommendation as stated on the paper to separate families or not.

That's a yes or no question.

[boneyard1962]

Originally Posted by Bureaucat

You are= You’re, not your

Some might say that is a deflection..

Which has what to do with what that poster said. I am glad that this forum isn't a grammar/ spelling test. I would be hammered for typo's non-stop.

Grammar nazis.

[DRob4JC]

Originally Posted by pknopp

She asked him if it was his recommendation as stated on the paper to separate families or not.

That's a yes or no question.

He clarified WHAT he recommended which is zero tolerance, not simply separating families. He knows she was looking for the pull quote to publicize - that's all she was doing.

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by DRob4JC

He clarified WHAT he recommended which is zero tolerance, not simply separating families.

The paper had a separation of families on it. You have to separate families to have zero tolerance?

[T-310]

Originally Posted by pknopp

"Removal proceedings". Lol. The system is, hearing, release.

And in removal proceedings. Happens all the time. Disprove it. Bet you can’t.

[DRob4JC]

Originally Posted by pknopp

The paper had a separation of families on it. You have to separate families to have zero tolerance?

Which is when he clarified that any US citizen if arrested with their children will be separated from their parents. Why should people here illegally NOT be separated if they are arrested?

Did you not listen to what was being said?