Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hilarious is that you want an exact dollar amount for a plans that haven't been implemented.
And once again, since you can't give exact temperatures in the future, that means you have zero knowledge of the climate and your comments are just quite silly and based upon nothing more than headlines.
People like you just need a cause to validate yourself, and you'll believe anything even though you can't back it up.
^^^^^This. The Progressives are so into themselves, when they are not taking "selfies" and posting them on Instagram, they are trying to convince themselves they can control everything in the universe with YOUR tax dollars.
^^^^^This. The Progressives are so into themselves, when they are not taking "selfies" and posting them on Instagram, they are trying to convince themselves they can control everything in the universe with YOUR tax dollars.
The irony is also that since I can't give an exact dollar amount in taxes that I would face in the future, he uses that to try and deny taxation will be used in these liberal climate schemes, yet he believes the "science" of AGW even though their models are constantly wrong.
Hilarious is that you want an exact dollar amount for a plans that haven't been implemented.
And once again, since you can't give exact temperatures in the future, that means you have zero knowledge of the climate and your comments are just quite silly and based upon nothing more than headlines.
Yeah yeah yeah, if you have no idea the cost then you have no issue with it. Otherwise, you’re complaining just to complain. Waste of time.
We accept the verdict of a jury, so why won't we accept the verdict of a panel of scientists?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz
Should science be a democracy? Can truth be put up to vote? And are scientists without bias?
In the day of Christ, the people did not accept the Word of One Man ... things are different now? (trump says it so it much be true)
One or two people can be bought off and tell the world what the man with the money would have them say ... much harder to buy off the all the scientist though, so there will be those who will tell the truth as they haven't anything to loose by not doing so.
Question is ... can we tell the difference between the truth and the lie?
I think when the day comes when we can't breathe ... we'll figure it out then.
So, other than exterminating the roughly 2 billion people with virtually no carbon footprint to prevent them from gaining basic things like refrigeration, ac, transportation, etc, how can it be stopped?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
