Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-26-2019, 06:09 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,571 posts, read 37,185,374 times
Reputation: 14022

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
I find that the propaganda ministry is careful to omit ANTHROPOGENIC from their denunciations.
The climate changes - that's a natural fact.
What is NOT a fact is that human activity is significantly causing that change on a global scale.
And that the Alarmists are not seeking common sense remedies to cope with change. They are seeking enrichment and power, which leads one to suspect that it is a HOAX.
. . .
No 'respectable' climate scientist admits that we can REVERSE the changes, nor specifies what is the official “normal.” Which begs the question, how does sequestering CO2 prevent the alleged disasters that have yet to manifest, when water vapor is the major greenhouse gas?

If anthropogenic climate change wasn't a hoax, we might see common sense initiatives like:
1) 80% transition to electric traction rail in place of long haul diesel trucking, urban and suburban mass transit. Not only will it save 90-95% in fuel, allow for energy recovery braking, but reduce petroleum consumption below domestic production.
2) Superinsulation, energy conservation, resilient and frugal housing. Housing consumes a substantial amount of resources to build, repair, and maintain. Ditto, for dealing with natural disasters.
3) Securing coastlines and recovering seafloor not unlike the Netherlands, with extensive levees and flood protection.

Why aren't the ALARMISTS seeking common sense solutions?

Former President BHO just bought beachfront property on Martha's Vineyard. Guess he's not too concerned. Why should we be? Unless he suddenly became a "climate denier" ! ! !
https://nypost.com/2019/08/22/barack...thas-vineyard/
You should publish your evidence that AGW doesn't exist....You would be famous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2019, 06:13 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,571 posts, read 37,185,374 times
Reputation: 14022
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
And then what?
Then we'll all be like the frog in the pot that's slowly brought to a boil....Difference is the frog can jump out of the pot, but so far we can't leave the earth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 06:26 PM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
16,960 posts, read 17,369,796 times
Reputation: 30258
SCAM! It doesn’t take an “expert” to know not one of their apocalyptic predictions has ever came true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 06:26 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,251,568 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Then we'll all be like the frog in the pot that's slowly brought to a boil....Difference is the frog can jump out of the pot, but so far we can't leave the earth.
Uh huh. Another apocalyptic prediction with no validity to your hypothesis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 06:44 PM
 
18,531 posts, read 8,331,509 times
Reputation: 13822
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Why do you post such drivel? July was 1.1 degree Celsius over the 20th century average...We have only about one half a degree to go to get to the point of no return.

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/...net-is-facing/
July was 0.07 degrees warmer than July 2016.....

...7/100th of a degree warmer...or only 4/100th degree C

that's an increase of 7/100th degree in 3 years


They use average cause it sounds like a bigger scarier number....and it fools people that don't look it up

..and I post NASA's drivel...it's their numbers...temperatures are increasing at the rate of 57/10,000th degree a year

NASA's drivel > https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs...l-temperature/

Last edited by Corrie22; 08-26-2019 at 06:59 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
6,933 posts, read 2,396,972 times
Reputation: 5004
All the alarmists have to back their outrageous flailing to "DO SOMETHING" are their computer models that predict DOOM!

Mr. Meteorologist, if he was honest, would admit the FACT that ALL meteorological computer models are BUNK mere days out!

The EURO, GFS, NAM, et al ad nauseum, are all a JOKE when the sampling is no longer available days out.

Hurricane maps three days out are spaghetti swirls of uncertainty!

Science corrupted by politics is EVIL; Legislation thereof will be the end of our Republic!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 07:04 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,413 posts, read 26,310,785 times
Reputation: 15692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Originalist View Post
Of course, you agree! I've yet to see you share an original thought. All you do is Google a meme that supports your notions (misguided as they may be) and then you quickly post it here as if you've had a life-changing epiphany.

YOU had to quickly find something, ANYTHING to counter this:


Post #2 shredded you and your fool in a single sentence.

SO SAD YOU
The only sad thing is that you didn’t stay with that thread to see that the op was embarrassed .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 07:08 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,413 posts, read 26,310,785 times
Reputation: 15692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultor View Post
Sorry, no scientist worth his salt would put up with, let alone go along with, the postmodern bullsh*t that emanates from the IPCC.
Well since around 97% of scientists believe that man is causing warming maybe you could quote some of those “scientists”.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 07:19 PM
 
18,531 posts, read 8,331,509 times
Reputation: 13822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Well since around 97% of scientists believe that man is causing warming maybe you could quote some of those “scientists”.
Information Quality Act Correction Request Regarding NASA’s Claim that 97 Percent
of Scientists Agree on Anthropogenic Global Warming


We ask NASA to determine that the claim that “[n]inety-seven percent of climate scientists agree
that climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities”
violates the IQA. As is shown below, that claim is not objective; it is neither accurate nor
reliable nor unbiased. This claim appears on the NASA web page titled “Climate Change: How
Do We Know?” among others.2

https://cei.org/sites/default/files/...cent_Final.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 07:25 PM
 
10,512 posts, read 5,180,429 times
Reputation: 14056
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
What is NOT a fact is that human activity is significantly causing that change on a global scale.
It is a fact that humans have changed the climate.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-c...-idUSKCN1QE1ZU

Scientists said "confidence that human activities were raising the heat at the Earth’s surface had reached a “five-sigma” level, a statistical gauge meaning there is only a one-in-a-million chance that the signal would appear if there was no warming." Five sigma means we know with 99.99994% certainty that man has changed the climate.

Really I think deniers should give up with the denial thing. It's not working, polls show a strong majority of Americans now accept manmade climate change as real. Time to move on and start contributing towards solutions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top