Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The policy guidance issued Wednesday stated that USCIS “no longer considers children of U.S. government employees and U.S. armed forces members residing outside the United States as ‘residing in the United States’ for purposes of acquiring citizenship under INA 320.”
The policy guidance issued Wednesday stated that USCIS “no longer considers children of U.S. government employees and U.S. armed forces members residing outside the United States as ‘residing in the United States’ for purposes of acquiring citizenship under INA 320.”
“USCIS issued a clarification to the rule later Wednesday, explaining that the new rule would only affect three categories of people: Children of non-U.S. citizens adopted by U.S. citizen government employees or service members; children of non-U.S. citizen government employees or service members who were naturalized after the child's birth; and children of U.S. citizens who do not meet residency requirements.”
This is the current policy. This new policy is suppose to go into effect in October 2019.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlightAttendant
NOOOOOOO it does NOT apply to military, contractors, embassy folks, etc who are US citizens or their offspring. DO NOT alarm people needlessly.
Yet under the purpose portion of this new policy it states:
Quote:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is issuing policy guidance in the USCIS
Policy Manual to address requirements for “residence” in statutory provisions related to
citizenship, and to rescind previous guidance regarding children of U.S. government employees
and members of the U.S. armed forces employed or stationed outside the United States.
Task and purpose is pretty darn good at making sure links are inserted into their news. I hope this goes before the Supreme court and gets booted. Life overseas is difficult enough, military families don't need to have this added to it.
Task and purpose is pretty darn good at making sure links are inserted into their news. I hope this goes before the Supreme court and gets booted. Life overseas is difficult enough, military families don't need to have this added to it.
That article was a complete mess, it should be taken down, and rewritten.
The new rule doesn't effect US citizens, calm down.
Task and purpose is pretty darn good at making sure links are inserted into their news. I hope this goes before the Supreme court and gets booted. Life overseas is difficult enough, military families don't need to have this added to it.
You have to ask yourself what kind of Administration would even consider this type of change? The answer is only one that is blatantly inept and that has nothing but disdain for the men and women who represent this nation overseas.
You have to ask yourself what kind of Administration would even consider this type of change? The answer is only one that is blatantly inept and that has nothing but disdain for the men and women who represent this nation overseas.
You have to ask yourself what kind of person can't even be bothered to read the thread that they are posting in.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
