Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-25-2019, 06:01 PM
 
Location: Rural Wisconsin
19,804 posts, read 9,353,220 times
Reputation: 38343

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
I can't wait for the day when this backfires on them.
That was one of my first thoughts, but if it passes, it probably won't because the sad fact is that the Democrat base is increasing and the number of rural residents are decreasing, if what I have read is true. The only hope for rural "flyover" states is to secede, and I would be in favor of that, even though it would be a major PITA and definitely have its downside. However, the sad fact is that, imo, we are already like two countries, instead of just one, in many ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-25-2019, 06:33 PM
 
2,923 posts, read 977,629 times
Reputation: 2080
I dont understand the one person one votes comments. It was specifically set up to not be that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2019, 07:21 PM
 
Location: Clyde Hill, WA
6,061 posts, read 2,009,739 times
Reputation: 2167
The NPVIC in essence exploits a loophole probably unforeseen by the framers, namely that the states have the freedom to determine how their electoral votes are to be apportioned. But the intent of the NPVIC is to circumvent the EC, which is explicitly written into the constitution.

If passed it would go to the SCOTUS and not survive, especially given the current make-up of the SCOTUS. As Atltech points out, it would probably not even come to that due to the compact clause

Quote:
Article I, Section 10, Clause 3, of the U.S. Constitution, which states, "No State shall, without the consent of Congress … enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State."
I can't fathom why so many spend so much time on this when we have the opioid crisis, a bellicose Iran, and so much else to worry about. Anyway, only about 5 times in about 230 years, (about 57 election cycles), has the loser of the popular vote won the presidency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2019, 07:32 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,270 posts, read 47,032,885 times
Reputation: 34060
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
On the contrary, it would INCREASE voter participation, especially in solid blue or red states.

One person, one vote, all votes count. Not a hard concept.

As it is in all "solid" blue or red states a lot of people feel their vote is useless since the result is a foregone conclusion in their state.
Gay marriage, legal pot pandoras box. To name a few. Abortion. Guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2019, 07:34 PM
 
7,827 posts, read 3,380,409 times
Reputation: 5141
This vote will not matter, as a federal court has already ruled that such actions as requiring electors to award their votes based on the popular vote is not legal.

https://denver.cbslocal.com/2019/08/...e-jared-polis/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top