CA Dems Please Chime In: 2020; Kamala Harris, Issues (border, ideologies, Wisconsin)

[2sleepy]

Originally Posted by stablegenius

Biden may have had a leg up on Trump before, but picking Harris could come back to bite him. She is very unlikable.

So is Trump, in fact he's one of the most 'unlikable' people to ever live in the White House https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...or-reelection/

[2sleepy]

Originally Posted by Mike930

The deplorable comment didn’t help. I’m curious to see if Harris acts similarly and will say people who don’t vote for her and Biden are misogynistic.

yeah that 'deplorable' remark was cringeworthy, when I heard her say that I told my husband - it's a wrap she just lost the votes that might have put her in the White House.

[1AngryTaxPayer]

Originally Posted by 2sleepy

That's a little dramatic, she's actually not a socialist at all throughout her career she's been a centrist.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...eet-crusaders/

Centrist,.... being focused on her. That type?

[RMESMH]

Originally Posted by Tulemutt

Oh geeze

As I was reading that post, I was thinking....I wonder if Tulemutt will respond to that post (he’s probably shaking his head if he’s reading it).

Thanks for not letting us down.

[Tulemutt]

Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer

Centrist,.... being focused on her. That type?

Ahahahaha

[RMESMH]

Originally Posted by happly retired

actually no its not- its America and we are not the worlds cops or worlds bail out of trouble country

most of us really dont care what the Germans or Chinese think of us or care and we especially dont give a crap what there world leaders think of say about us. while you worry about someone words i will buy a couple hundred acres of high desert land that in 200 years will become beach front property and my heirs will be set.

progressive and liberals hate the fact the trump is bringing back the principles of america first like our country was founded on.

^^^^^ Should be a case study re successful propaganda .

the fact that we are keeping more of the money we earn, the fact we are not beholden to a bunch or towel wrapped people 10,000 mile away to be able to drive our cars, the fact that we say KMA if you think we are going to protect you if your not willing to protect yourself is just fine with me and most of us.

tree huggers would rather see us live in tents and drive scooters - why are you not taking your anger and direct it to india, russia, china if you want to worry about the environment? stop buying thier products where is uproar. America has done its fair share of protecting the environment and improving our lives. Try living in card box box like in mexico, or in raw sewage rivers in india orb earth the air in china sometime.

this election is about america and the citizens that live here and our standard of living - and i am not voting for anyone that wants to lower my or my children's standard of living.

I didn’t think it would be possible for a poster to lose all current and future credibility in nine words ^^^^^, but you managed to pull off that feat.

[stablegenius]

Originally Posted by 2sleepy

So is Trump, in fact he's one of the most 'unlikable' people to ever live in the White House https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...or-reelection/

Just saying he didn’t help his chances by picking her.

[RMESMH]

Originally Posted by Tulemutt

No he didn’t. A couple of his campaign managers (i.e. Parscal) played it for him. He’s dumb as a box of rocks and was totally surprised he won. Seemed he was actually trying to lose but wanted as many followers as possible: I remain convinced he ran to develop an audience for a media venture catering to “victims of the system” mentality.

Yep, me too re the bolded. I also think he was trying to ruffle/P-Off Obama a bit for making fun of him at the 2011 WHCD, and add in some general ‘trying to enhance his brand’ to boot.

[2sleepy]

Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer

Centrist,.... being focused on her. That type?

Did you read the WaPo article I linked? If not, here's another one https://www.latimes.com/politics/sto...tical-instinct

[roadwarrior101]

Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer

Centrist,.... being focused on her. That type?

Only FoxNews viewers and Q-Anon followers would call her a radical socialist. Really shows how extreme right the Republican party has turned over the past few years. Definitely not an inclusive party that appeals to all (or most) Americans. Their base is fervent but they are shrinking as demographics change. Either the Republican party needs to adapt to the 21st century reality of America or they won't be relevant here long term.