Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There was significant and unknown amount of damage to the base of the building. The following image is the only one I'm aware of that even begins to show what the damage is. You probably won't find any references to it on the conspiracy sites
That is a severely compromised structure just from that picture alone and that's just the corner, the amount of damage to the front where most of the debris fell is unknown.
The crash in PA. Think about any or all the plane crashes you have seen in person or on video. One thing all have in common was there was debris everywhere. In PA there was a hole in the ground and not a piece of paper floating by. Where was all the deris.
The Pentagon attack and the Pennsylvania downing are far more consistent with missile strikes than plane crashes.
These are only a few of the oddities about 9/11.
There was plenty of debris at both sites, just not a lot of big pieces. As the speed of something increases the energy increase is cubed thus the energy increases exponentially. Something traveling at 100 miles per hour has 4 times the energy of something traveling at 50MPH. to demonstrate if you can raise the speed of a ping pong ball to the speed of sound you can make a nearly perfect hole in a ping pong paddle.
At the speeds those planes were traveling things like aluminum plane bodies have a tendency to disintegrate... This plane would be traveling a bit slower than the estimated 550MPH plus for the PA plane.
The point of this study (ignoring all of the distraction that is posted on this thread) is to show that Building 7, which was NOT hit by a plane or seriously damaged by falling debris, and came straight down into a controlled demolition style rubble pile at the rate of free fall speed.... could not have fallen that way without assistance. Anyone who watches the video of it's collapse will see this clearly (and you can even see the pre explosions blowing out the columns).
The original engineers that help build the buildings themselves said that there's no way that could have happened without help, especially in regards to the WTC buildings, as they were built to sustain multiple jet liner impacts.
Read the study and watch the video. Put down emotions and just think about it. Getting this issue right is too important to let any emotion play into it.
The point of this study (ignoring all of the distraction that is posted on this thread) is to show that Building 7, which was NOT hit by a plane or seriously damaged by falling debris, and came straight down into a controlled demolition style rubble pile at the rate of free fall speed.... could not have fallen that way without assistance. Anyone who watches the video of it's collapse will see this clearly (and you can even see the pre explosions blowing out the columns).
But it was damaged by falling debris, did you not see the pic thecoalman posted of the SW corner starting at the 18th Floor and going down to the ground level. And then you even have an eye witness account from someone who was actually there and you still don't believe him, man the tinfoil hats came out of the woodwork this morning!
The point of this study (ignoring all of the distraction that is posted on this thread) is to show that Building 7, which was NOT hit by a plane or seriously damaged by falling debris, and came straight down into a controlled demolition style rubble pile at the rate of free fall speed.... could not have fallen that way without assistance. Anyone who watches the video of it's collapse will see this clearly (and you can even see the pre explosions blowing out the columns).]
The only true thing I can find it that paragraph is that WTC was not hit by a plane. It as hit by a really tall skyscraper falling down.
I'll be honest. If someone I know in real life ever started telling me they believe the government brought down those buildings, I would probably have to cut off ties with them. I can stand a lot of things. Stupidity is nto one of them
How about an independent study NOT funded by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth!
Next you'll post a study funded by Big Tobacco on how cigarettes are actually good for you, prevent cancer and make you live forever!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
