Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why don't we work on some of the actual problems that currently face us, such as the national debt, failing public schools, mass shootings, illegal immigration...list goes on.
We can talk about robotics and job loss when it actually starts to happen. US unemployment rate is currently 3.7%. Traditionally economists have considered 4% to be 'full employment' since there are always a few people between jobs for various reasons.
The robot maintenance team will tend to be much smaller than the workforce the robots would replace due to the tendency of tech to be centralized.
I also don't agree with government meddling as the solution, but these large corporations are screwing themselves in the long run, because if everyone is automated out of a job, how will they buy the corporations' products?
The few who remain employed to keep the automation running will not be enough to sustain the economy.
That's a grim forecast that has been made many times in the past but never realized.
Automation makes life easier because it does the tedious, dangerous and difficult tasks faster and cheaper than humans can.
The things robots can't do will still be done by humans, so were not going to see massive unemployment due to automation.
As productivity increases due to improvements in automation, the products we buy will get cheaper and cheaper while quality increases.
There really isn't a down side unless you are too lazy to prepare for the jobs of the future.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.