Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You would think wrong because an unfinished lower receiver cannot be regulated as a firearm and are easily put together in your garage making an instant black market for them.
Where are millions of pieces of tangible property, made of aluminum and steel, going to "dry up " to?
They would be sold back to the government through a buy-back program and then crushed. They would never be sold to civilians again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo302
How can the "Guv", "buy back" property that it never owned?
You bought it when you could. Now you can't. Confiscation with no remuneration is not fair, so you have to have a way to get your money back. They bought your old cars, didn't they?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo302
This imaginary term does not actually refer to anything in reality.
"Crowd Killers". Agreed. I just made it up. It refers to firearms that are either clip fed or magazine fed. You call 'em what you want.
They would be sold back to the government through a buy-back program and then crushed. They would never be sold to civilians again.
so a manufacturing and sales ban coupled with confiscation?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307
You bought it when you could. Now you can't. Confiscation with no remuneration is not fair, so you have to have a way to get your money back. They bought your old cars, didn't they?
It is clearly a dishonest term.
Confiscation with payment is not "fair" either.
And No, no "they" did not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307
"Crowd Killers". Agreed. I just made it up. It refers to firearms that are either clip fed or magazine fed. You call 'em what you want.
Any magazine fed or clip fed firearms, would be all but 0.01% of all firearms in existence in the US.
Perhaps you are unaware of what the term "clip fed" or even "magazine fed", encompasses.
I'd make it mandatory that before anyone could be licensed to carry a gun they'd have to take a written test plus firing range test. No different than getting a driver license. You have to know the law and how to operate the item in question
I'd make it mandatory that before anyone could be licensed to carry a gun they'd have to take a written test plus firing range test. No different than getting a driver license. You have to know the law and how to operate the item in question
Gun rights are part of our constitution. I’m probably in the minority but I would gladly give up our rights in order to save more innocent lives. Lives are more important
Gun violence is a symptom of social pathology that would manifest itself in other ways. In criminology parlance, gun access is not the root cause of gun violence.
Historically legal restrictions on weapon ownership are a defining mark of tyranny. Gun access is necessary to have a free society.
I'd mimic those countries who've successfully maintained gun violence to a minimum regardless of Our Second Amendment Right.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
