Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You seem to have me confused with someone who is anti gun.
The point is that magazine limits are basically the anti gun crowd deciding how many deaths are acceptable rather than actually trying to solve the violence issue.
Haven’t been called a liberal in a while. It’s amusing, especially when my status plainly declares my political leanings.
Then why the comment that you made? It contradicts where you stand.
It's 6 rounds per before needing to pull the clip and replace. A good friend of mine represented the Air Force in competitions for years and this was what he told me. He was in competitions all over the country.
Anybody can sponsor a local competitive shooting match with whatever the rules he wants and banging away in an indoor firing range is also not the same. Obviously I'm not talking about that.
You don't pull a clip. You drop it into the receiver/magwell and yank it out or it drops out on the last shot. Magazines are removable.
It's 6 rounds per before needing to pull the clip and replace. A good friend of mine represented the Air Force in competitions for years and this was what he told me. He was in competitions all over the country.
Anybody can sponsor a local competitive shooting match with whatever the rules he wants and banging away in an indoor firing range is also not the same. Obviously I'm not talking about that.
USPSA, IDPA, 3-Gun, etc. are the most popular shooting competitions in the US. All require more than 6 rounds total, and none require six round strings.
Again, ignorance. Care to show us what else you clearly don’t know?
My common sense tells me we should focus our time, energy, and funds to figure out and solve why our fellow citizens choose to kill innocent people in mass.
The method will evolve with any restrictions enacted, we need to solve the cause.
But you can’t use common sense to ever figure it out. If someone wants to cause mass harm, they can easily do it. I can go out and kill my neighbor, someone who cut me off on the road or a kid that is bullying my son.(all made up). I just would never do it because I never get that angry over anything and I also wouldn’t want to take someone’s life. I also wouldn’t want to go to jail and pay for that crime. But, if I had nothing to live for, or got so angry that I was about to burst, it could be done easily. Anyone can do it. But nearly no one does or ever will. So, it all comes down to the individual that does it. You will never predict the next attack. And each is different than the next. If I wanted to shoot up the elementary school down the street,I could easily get in and do it. And so can nearly anyone.
Guns are not the problem. People are. That cannot be argued. The guns are already out there, you cannot get them from everyone. So, only the criminals and nut jobs will have them how will that stop the next big shootout?
Clip fed. Do you even know what weapons take “clips”?
Does it matter?
What is this, "Semiautomatic Trivial Pursuit"?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
