Greta Thunberg vs. 500 Climate Scientists

[TOkidd]

Originally Posted by Pilot1

NASA, ONAA and some others admitted to manipulating historical temperature data to get the outcomes they wanted. They have no credulity, and their models only give them what they want. The are government bureaucrat stooges, that only want to grow government through climate hysteria.

So then who do you trust?

[UrbanAdventurer]

Originally Posted by TOkidd

So then who do you trust?

No idea, but definitely not them.

[UrbanAdventurer]

Originally Posted by Pilot1

She is getting compensated. They just don't call it a "salary", but like the Canadian girl before her, she'll make millions. Soros is also backing her and this movement.

She's a bad actress from a family of carnival clowns.

http://mileswmathis.com/greta.pdf

[normstad]

For those that question the degree of consensus, this Wikipedia article is informative.

https://wiki2.org/en/Scientific_cons...nsensus_points

[cuebald]

Originally Posted by VLWH

She may mean well, but as posted, she needs to understand reality.

She does, better than most adults. This has been her focus for a third of her life.

Her understanding comes from empirical evidence gathered by 97% of the world's climate scientists.

[Pilot1]

Originally Posted by TOkidd

So then who do you trust?

Nobody that tells me "the science is settled" and the "debate is over" and pushes "fixes" that are ALL ECONOMIC REDISTRIBUTION. Then uses panic and alarmist tactics to try to SCARE ME into compliance and submission to what they want.


Wake up.

[cuebald]

Originally Posted by UrbanAdventurer

No idea, but definitely not them.

You have no idea who to trust, but you have a concrete opinion?

That's like saying "The sky is green" when you are standing outside with everyone else looking at it, and still insisting it's not blue when they contradict you. Without some sort of demonstrable evidence to support it, an opinion isn't worth a bucket of warm spit.

[The Dark Enlightenment]

Originally Posted by cuebald

You have no idea who to trust, but you have a concrete opinion?

Good point. It's fine to be skeptical about the pronouncements of experts on extremely complex matters like climate change that no one really understands completely. But when you start thinking of yourself as the real expert, you've gone off the rails.