Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There are many Americans who don’t want Trump as our President.
Trump is bad for our country.
Then you have the opportunity to change that November 3, 2020 - just like your fellow Americans voted in a way that changed the party of the president on November 8, 2016.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.
The complaint has to be verified, the IG didn't portray it as hearsay nor did the DNI head.
Yet the whistleblower did......
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight
Some will vote for Trump because of his claims of deep state and the media is going after him, but there will also be many that have seen him in action for 4 years and probably don't want to see his act again.
Except for....what were those few people who held positions very high in the FBI...and you are right, they don't want to see those people anymore....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight
The division is bad for the country , do you really see this changing if he is reelected. He just cant help himself, surely the republicans have something better.
Do you really think the division started with trump...really?
The complaint has to be verified, the IG didn't portray it as hearsay nor did the DNI head.
Some will vote for Trump because of his claims of deep state and the media is going after him, but there will also be many that have seen him in action for 4 years and probably don't want to see his act again.
The division is bad for the country , do you really see this changing if he is reelected. He just cant help himself, surely the republicans have something better.
Did you read the complaint?
"I was not a direct witness to most of the events described. However, I found my
colleagues' accounts of these events to be credible because, in almost all cases, multiple
officials recounted fact patterns that were consistent with one another."
That is 100% hearsay.
I don't care if he found it credible because blah blah. He states plain as day he wasn't even there.
"I was not a direct witness to most of the events described. However, I found my
colleagues' accounts of these events to be credible because, in almost all cases, multiple
officials recounted fact patterns that were consistent with one another."
That is 100% hearsay.
I don't care if he found it credible because blah blah. He states plain as day he wasn't even there.
Give us a break.
And lets not forget page 3, 4th paragraph, last sentence.....(paraphrased) I don't know if the people I got my information were even at the phone call....
The complaint has to be verified, the IG didn't portray it as hearsay nor did the DNI head.
Some will vote for Trump because of his claims of deep state and the media is going after him, but there will also be many that have seen him in action for 4 years and probably don't want to see his act again.The division is bad for the country , do you really see this changing if he is reelected. He just cant help himself, surely the republicans have something better.
Just maybe those in favor of him sticking around do not want anything to change. They like his behavior, his politics, and they enjoy watching the crash and burn of liberal/democrats time after time.
And lets not forget page 3, 4th paragraph, last sentence.....(paraphrased) I don't know if the people I got my information were even at the phone call....
Here's even more:
"In the days following the phone call, I learned from multiple U.S. officials that senior White
House officials had intervened to "lock down" all records of the phone call, especially the
official word-for-word transcript of the call that was produced-as is customary-by the White
House Situation Room."
It's normal for the WH to "lock down" records. News has made no mention of that, either.
"I was not a direct witness to most of the events described. However, I found my colleagues' accounts of these events to be credible because, in almost all cases, multiple officials recounted fact patterns that were consistent with one another."
That is 100% hearsay.
I don't care if he found it credible because blah blah. He states plain as day he wasn't even there.
Give us a break.
The fact that it is second hand changes nothing, ask the IG and the head of DNI. His complaint will be investigated, besides the allegations are corroborated by Trump himself in his transcript that he finally released. The complaint was filed in August and Trump just released the transcript this week, why was it so secretive and why the change of heart. He knew this was coming and decided to make believe he was transparent.
"In the days following the phone call, I learned from multiple U.S. officials that senior White
House officials had intervened to "lock down" all records of the phone call, especially the
official word-for-word transcript of the call that was produced-as is customary-by the White
House Situation Room."
It's normal for the WH to "lock down" records. News has made no mention of that, either.
No it was not normal procedure to place a conversation with the Ukraine president on the most secure server.
The fact that it is second hand changes nothing, ask the IG and the head of DNI. His complaint will be investigated, besides the allegations are corroborated by Trump himself in his transcript that he finally released.
Seriously? Good thing you're not a judge.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.