Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How can you " fear for your life " when no one knows who you are ?
Cloak and dagger, that's the Democracy Dems want for America.
To be a " whistle blower " there must be something concrete to blow the whistle on.
Besides the Lefty MSM already conducting their trial and calling for Impeachment, along with quite a few Dems, the only legal statement by the DOJ is that they didn't see any Laws violated.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't that AG Barr ruling apply to "campaign finance laws." Last I heard, this is about far more than campaign finance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuele
So what exactly are the " high crimes and misdemeanors" that the Whistle Blower is whistling ?
That falls under the Constitution where it is to be weighed by Congress, not the DOJ.
We have a whistleblower attempting to provide evidence to be supported by other testimony that might help answer your question.
If you wanted to know the whistleblower's identity, then maybe Trump shouldn't have been calling for their death on Twitter. As it stands, too many of his followers are unhinged and hopped up on his rhetoric for it to be safe.
This is by far not the first time Trump has attempted to incite his troglodytic followers to violence. There are probably a few hundred of them this morning sitting in their garages hugging their AR-15s and salivating over the prospect of killing the whistleblower to win the love of Dear Leader, and being proclaimed a hero for protecting him from all those nasty Democrats who persist in believing something other than what he tells them.
Dems have placed Adam Schiff in charge, and some of the Testimony will be behind closed doors, in secret.
That's one of the reasons Nancy skipped the House Floor Vote. Now Dems can release drips and drabs to the media enablers to drive their narrative.
They will do everything they can to keep the identity of the " whistle blower" secret.
How many times have BOTH parties had sessions behind closed doors?
This is by far not the first time Trump has attempted to incite his troglodytic followers to violence. There are probably a few hundred of them this morning sitting in their garages hugging their AR-15s and salivating over the prospect of killing the whistleblower to win the love of Dear Leader, and being proclaimed a hero for protecting him from all those nasty Democrats who persist in believing something other than what he tells them.
Sure why not try a bit of Stochastic Terrorism when you're already up sh** creek.
The identity of the whistleblower must remain secret, for his and his family's protection, and to insure that future whistleblowers will not hesitate out of fear for their personal safety.
All the whistleblower did was say that he believed there was a situation that the House should look into, because there may be crimes being committed. That is what any decent American would do who wasn't rabidly loyal to a party rather than to their country.
A coup, BTW, is normally a violent overthrow, and in this case, nothing but empty rhetoric by a toddler president who barely has a grasp of the English tongue. Impeachment is a valid and peaceful legal process prescribed by our Constitution to root out corruption.
But first it has to be established if the whistle blower had the ability to do what was done, and how it was done.
This is a phone call in the White House by POTUS. There are rules, regulations regarding many of the contributing circumstances.
When an opposing Party on record, from Day One of the Presidency starts using any and all means possible to undo the results of a free and fair election, and after they come up empty time and time again, putting the American public through the wringer for almost 3 years , what do you call it ?
The brilliance of the Framers has been in full view, and it will continue. They knew this was likely to happen, and they put in all the stops necessary. But Dems need to bend the rules, cloaked in secrecy , avoid precedent by not having a floor vote. Their march continues, this is just a different version of the drum beat.
The Democrat now in charge lied overand over in public, to the American people, that there was " evidence in plain sight"
Where is it Adam ? We are still waiting.
And he is to be trusted holding " secret" testimony ?
both of them do, depending on the subject at hand. If it a matter of national security, the meetings are always private.
I would say an inquiry into whether a sitting president may be a traitor rises to that level.
IMO, I don’t think they should be allowed to have closed sessions myself not unless we are at war or something similar. Our taxes dollars is what pays these fools we have a right to know what’s being said.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
