Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's the problem. Giuliani couldn't come up with anything because there was nothing to come up with.
Why is that so hard to understand?
Why doesn’t that apply to Russian “ collusion “ ?
Dems couldn’t come up with anything because there was nothing to come up with.
And Michael Cohen ?
Dems couldn’t come up with anything because there was nothing to come up with .
Have the electors change their votes ?
File lawsuit after lawsuit.
Boycott the inauguration?
Dems couldn’t come up with anything because there was nothing to come up with.
Why is that so hard to understand?
On Sept 19 Schiff said in Public that if it wasn’t for the IG, the knowledge of the complaint existing would not be known
We just found out today from The NY Times, not only did Schiff know, he sent the Whistle blower to the proper authority.
That's the problem. Giuliani couldn't come up with anything because there was nothing to come up with.
Why is that so hard to understand?
It's the inconsistency between thinking that Biden's quid pro quo situation where he withheld aid on the behalf of his son's company to get a corruption case dropped is fine but Trump mentioning that situation and suggesting it be looked into is a "high crime".
I mean, I get it, there's not any actual thought being put into it, just tribal politics, but if given the benefit of the doubt and taken seriously it's hard to understand
Who said Trump was interested in corruption in Ukraine? Presumably, if he was interested in corruption, he would have said “do us a favor, though, and look into cracking down on corruption” instead of “do us a favor, though... look into Joe Biden and his son.”
Plus, had he done the former instead of the latter, White House attorneys would not have felt compelled to improperly hide the conversation on an eyes-only White House server, an added bonus.
Trump has many interests in Ukraine. His false Biden allegations of course, but this bozo thinks there is a secret server in the Ukraine with Hillary's emails. We, the US taxpayers are paying Trump's henchmen to fly all over the world looking to prove that and other conspiracy theories.
This man was elected president, but has spent his entire term chasing fantasies, while we pay for it all, in addition to his family and their business trips (which coincidentally nobody is talking about--the Trump presidential spawn taking money from companies all over the world, but, but--Hunter Biden).
We desperately need a real president before this one burns down the whole country.
Trump has many interests in Ukraine. His false Biden allegations of course, but this bozo thinks there is a secret server in the Ukraine with Hillary's emails. We, the US taxpayers are paying Trump's henchmen to fly all over the world looking to prove that and other conspiracy theories.
This man was elected president, but has spent his entire term chasing fantasies, while we pay for it all, in addition to this family and their business trips (which coincidentally nobody is talking about--the Trump presidential spawn taking money from companies all over the world, but, but--Hunter Biden).
We desperately need a real president before this one burns down the whole country.
It's the inconsistency between thinking that Biden's quid pro quo situation where he withheld aid on the behalf of his son's company to get a corruption case dropped is fine but Trump mentioning that situation and suggesting it be looked into is a "high crime".
I mean, I get it, there's not any actual thought being put into it, just tribal politics, but if given the benefit of the doubt and taken seriously it's hard to understand
He admitted to doing it, so yeah it really did happen. He had an excuse for it but it's the only time he ever did something like that.... which makes sense because it was personal, he did it so his crackhead son could continue to make 50k a month.
The fact that you completely dismiss that situation suggests you might not be entirely impartial and this might just be tribal politics at play.
The fact that you completely dismiss that situation suggests you might not be entirely impartial and this might just be tribal politics at play.
Nah what it suggests is a grounding in reality rather than hairbrained debunked conspiracy theory nonsense.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
