Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
At least four national security officials were so alarmed by the Trump administration’s attempts to pressure Ukraine for political purposes that they raised concerns with a White House lawyer both before and immediately after President Trump’s July 25 call with that country’s president, according to U.S. officials and other people familiar with the matter.
The nature and timing of the previously undisclosed discussions with National Security Council legal adviser John Eisenberg indicate that officials were delivering warnings through official White House channels earlier than previously understood — including before the call that precipitated a whistleblower complaint and the impeachment inquiry of the president.
It's quite clear that a lot of people are going to be in big trouble once this is all said and done.
The question is, as some of the big names go down (Mike Pompeo, Rick Perry, Ghouliani, Bill Barr, etc), will they remain loyal to Trump until the end, and just resign, and possibly even get arrested?
Or will these people who are all going out of their way to protect Donald flip on him just when the final bit of the USS Trump Administration is about to go under?
No. The Mueller probe turned up nothing. So it's necessary to keep the pot stirring with every single U.S. government entity.
Y'know what's funny? There's absolutely nothing about this on the front page of Breitbart. They're completely living in their own bubble: https://www.breitbart.com/
Is Pelosi really saying that Impeachment can be done by ONE party and without ANY votes? Really Democrats? Really? You know what, don't complain if it happens again in the future... You better be careful of what you wished for cause it will come back to haunt you...
Then show us the part of the constitution that states that you have to have a formal vote to commence an investigation that might lead to articles of impeachment - since you are so sure that it requires a vote it should be easy for you to produce some proof.
So you respond with insults to posts that, by your own admission, you don't even read. Weird.
I had the same issue with Chuck, but he apologized after a little nudging because I was politely insistent that he was mistaken. And I accepted his apology. Yay for civil discourse!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
