Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I know huh! Lol! Try a creditable source, OP, like MSNBC. If you want serious unbiased news based ONLY on FACTS!, try CNN! Especially journalists like Don Lemon.
Based on my understanding, there were approximately a dozen White House officials who listened to the call-a mixture of policy officials and duty officers in the White House Situation Room, as is customary.
...
In addition to White House personnel, I was told that a State Department official, Mr. T. Ulrich Brechbuhl, also listened in on the call.
I was not the only non-White House official to receive a readout of the call. Based on my understanding, multiple State Department and Intelligence Community officials were also briefed on the contents of the call as outlined above.
So yes, the whistle blower does in fact know that the information came from people who listened to the phone call themselves. There were a bunch of people who listened to the phone call. That, of course, is where the concerns and information came from in the first place.
The White House Staffers were in the Situation room. According to the WhistleBlower, who Maguire said was credible, 6 different individuals related the contents of the conversation. As others already posted, expect Trump to Clean house. The staffers in the Situation room are typically a mix of appointed and career intelligence people. I expect the career folks to get the “you’re FIRED” treatment
Did you even read the whistleblowers letter? Page 3, 4th paragraph, last sentence.....
"I do not know whether anyone was physically present with the president during the call" Those are the exact words.....
So yes, the whistle blower does in fact know that the information came from people who listened to the phone call themselves. There were a bunch of people who listened to the phone call. That, of course, is where the concerns and information came from in the first place.
Did you read the LAST sentence? does not seem you did....
"I do not know whether anyone was physically present with the President during the call."
"there were approximately a dozen White House officials who listened to the call"
Plus:
"a State Department official, Mr. T. Ulrich Brechbuhl, also listened in on the call"
So, there were about a dozen people who actually listened in on the call. And your complaint is that he was unsure if anyone was physically in the same room as him? What would it matter if anyone was physically in the same room as long as a dozen or so people were listening in on the call?
If that's all you can come up with goes to show how desperate you are.
If this was so egregious why didn't any one of the at least 12 people in the room say something themselves?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What would it matter if anyone was physically in the same room as long as a dozen or so people were listening in on the call? 
