Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It all goes to show the wisdom of Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Shultz (D,FL). She has said that ultimately we need to put stringent regulations on ammunitions. Ultimately the gun is just a dispenser. You don't stop lung cancer by putting extra regulations on cartons vs. packs vs. single cigarettes, or electronic machines vs. old-style mechanical cig. vending machines.
The next major leverage to give to a mass shooter is advanced body armor. The guns are pretty much maxed out, now its creating body armor so bad a$$ that cops can't stop the shooter and will take massive casualties themselves.
The next best material after kevlar is going to be a game-changer.
It all goes to show the wisdom of Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Shultz (D,FL). She has said that ultimately we need to put stringent regulations on ammunitions. Ultimately the gun is just a dispenser. You don't stop lung cancer by putting extra regulations on cartons vs. packs vs. single cigarettes, or electronic machines vs. old-style mechanical cig. vending machines.
The AR-15 is clearly the deadliest, most powerful weapon ever invented by man. So if someone makes it a 'boogie man,' they would be justified. Only the 475 Limbaugh might be more powerful, but does not hold as many bullets in its clip.
I read most of the article, and do not understand why they could not prosecute this guy. The issue of 'upper' vs. 'lower' did come up in another thread. From what expert posters said, the upper is totally unregulated under the law. That is not right! You pass a background check for a gun with a particular level of power. If you wish to 'upper' that level, you should have to go through another background check.
I'm sorry, you clearly do not have as much knowledge as you think you do on this subject.
You should learn about The dunning Kruger effect
Your entire argument, everything you posted is wrong.
Just for starters the "basic most common AR15" is the least powerful version. You can make AR15s in significantly more powerful calibers. And, don't forget about big brother AR10 which can fire various FULL size rifle cartridges with an accurate range to over a mile.
Ignore all the other similar guns, AK47, scar, m1a, mini14 etc... That all do the same thing as your boogy man.
It all goes to show the wisdom of Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Shultz (D,FL). She has said that ultimately we need to put stringent regulations on ammunitions. Ultimately the gun is just a dispenser. You don't stop lung cancer by putting extra regulations on cartons vs. packs vs. single cigarettes, or electronic machines vs. old-style mechanical cig. vending machines.
The AR-15 is clearly the deadliest, most powerful weapon ever invented by man. So if someone makes it a 'boogie man,' they would be justified. Only the 475 Limbaugh might be more powerful, but does not hold as many bullets in its clip.
I read most of the article, and do not understand why they could not prosecute this guy. The issue of 'upper' vs. 'lower' did come up in another thread. From what expert posters said, the upper is totally unregulated under the law. That is not right! You pass a background check for a gun with a particular level of power. If you wish to 'upper' that level, you should have to go through another background check.
"AR-15 is clearly the deadliest, most powerful weapon ever invented by man." I hope you are being sarcastic.
"You pass a background check for a gun with a particular level of power" i did not know you need to pass a background to buy a .22 AR-15 rifle.
A warning would be good, but also a background check for buying bullets. Currently in most states there is no check for the purchase of bullets. Also stores (and state governments) should follow Walmart's lead by banning short-barrel ammunitions.
"]A warning would be good, but also a background check for buying bullets."
Bullets are considered PART of "ARMS", as in The RIGHT......shall NOT be INFRINGED"!.
The AR-15 is clearly the deadliest, most powerful weapon ever invented by man. So if someone makes it a 'boogie man,' they would be justified. Only the 475 Limbaugh might be more powerful, but does not hold as many bullets in its clip.
I read most of the article, and do not understand why they could not prosecute this guy. The issue of 'upper' vs. 'lower' did come up in another thread. From what expert posters said, the upper is totally unregulated under the law. That is not right! You pass a background check for a gun with a particular level of power. If you wish to 'upper' that level, you should have to go through another background check.
OMG. LOL. So many indicators this person has no clue what he is talking about. None. "Upper that level". HAHAHAHHAHA. Wow.
Why are short barrels mechanically more dangerous and deadly?
......
Thank-you. I've been trying to figure that one out myself.
If I change out my 16" barrelled upper with a 10" one, but yet it takes the same ammo, what changes?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
