LGBTs seek to co-opt civil rights act of 1964.

[Pilot1]

The Media, Entertainment, Education, Social Media, and Government have bent over backwards to not only accommodate LGBT but glorify and promote it as "Normal and even preferred, when maybe 1%-3% of the population identifies as such. It is a FARCE, and they do not deserve any special rights.


Maybe they should just live there lives. Most people don't care, one way or another.

[TheEmissary]

Originally Posted by Tritone

I have never typed a single falsehood. Every word I've ever said about the origin of the "latino" victim group was true. A white English-speaking person that's related to a Spanish-speaker qualifies as a minority and is entitled to all the same protections that were originally intended for black people. That's an objectively ridiculous concept that was never real to begin with. They even get called "people of color".

This attempt to write LGBTQUIXYZ++++ into it is just another con in the same vein. Now a white male who's bi-curious may get these same legal protections. That's a goddamned sham. That's not what civil rights was about.

Well, become "white and bi-curious" and you too can qualify! Aren't you curious?

[Absolom]

Originally Posted by silverkris

Sorry, dude. Your track record of hostility towards civil rights laws is well worn, and belongs in the dustbin of history.

Jim Crow ain't coming back.

The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 isn't coming back.

Title IX isn't going away.

Nor are gay folks going back into the closet.

LOL, Title IX will be worthless when every women's sports team is filled with men.

[newtovenice]

Originally Posted by Tritone

Supreme Court to consider whether LGBT workers are protected by civil rights law.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/08/u...ansgender.html

This is happening again. Another victim group wants special civil rights protections that were never intended for them. This is another attempt to piggy-back off civil rights by broadening the interpretation to include them. "Sex" in the civil rights act meant male or female, it had nothing to do with gay or straight.

If this goes through, a person with some LGBT+ identity or sexual preference (which they can invent at whim) can get legal protections for that. The implications of this are more far-reaching than it might seem at first. It would be a mess.

Wouldn't they have to declare their LGBTQKAHDBGKABDFGKAJD status upfront to EVERYONE at all times for this to be in play?

Otherwise how would anyone know what they are to ensure that their special protections were addressed?

I don't think that would go over well in that community.