Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-18-2019, 07:17 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,004,475 times
Reputation: 15559

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by boneyard1962 View Post
Actually I planned on voting for Tulsi. I wrote in Jim Webb in 2016. I detest party hardliners and I really detest Hillary. I hold her in the same distaste as I do Trump. I also love calling out the hypocrisy, especially by the hard left.
in 2012 Romney was chastised for thinking of the Russians as a threat. Obama made a hot mic promise. All was supported by the hardliners on the left. Now suddenly Russia is the bad guys again.

Imagine if it was Trump involved with the Uranium one deal and Imagine if the Trump foundation enjoyed Millions in donations from people connected to the uranium one deal? I didn't vote for Hillary or Trump for the same reason.
Tulsi hasn't a hope of heck in landing in the top 6 -- never had a chance.

She wasn't well known enough and now her whining and stomping has completely taken her out of the race.

I think she might be thinking to jump ship and that's why she is playing this game. Good for her. She's a really good Republican really.

I can't imagine she thinks this will work in her favor with Democrats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-18-2019, 07:22 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,602,303 times
Reputation: 29385
If you're not among the insane candidates, that makes you a good Republican.

Friends on the right - it appears you just received a compliment!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2019, 07:26 PM
 
Location: SE Asia
16,236 posts, read 5,877,477 times
Reputation: 9117
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
Tulsi hasn't a hope of heck in landing in the top 6 -- never had a chance.

She wasn't well known enough and now her whining and stomping has completely taken her out of the race.

I think she might be thinking to jump ship and that's why she is playing this game. Good for her. She's a really good Republican really.

I can't imagine she thinks this will work in her favor with Democrats.
I agree with your conclusions completely. That however doesn't influence who I will vote for, I mean other than who not to vote for. I watched the DNC and the democrat part pull their crap on Bernie last time. It really was eye opening. For me it's almost to the point: If the party backs a candidate run away and vote for someone else.

Some say that doing a write in is a waste of a vote. I disagree. The wasted vote is for someone you feel doesn't represent your beliefs, but the party backs. That is a wasted vote. Better to not vote at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2019, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,259,269 times
Reputation: 27861
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
https://mobile.twitter.com/thedailyb...07463127244801


Everyone who disagrees with dems is a Russian asset.
Lol
Hey Hillary...……


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6t_PdfrYvk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2019, 07:29 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,004,475 times
Reputation: 15559
Tulsi Gabbard isn’t a Russian asset. But it does appear the Russian government and the alt right are doing everything they can to prop her up and divide the Democratic party so that Trump can win a second term.

And Gabbard is playing along.

Her tweets suggests the whole race is between her and Clinton -- WHAT? Clinton has said definitely she is not going to run....but now Gabbard, Carlson are suggesting this means Clinton may run.

Nope not going to happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2019, 07:42 PM
 
Location: USA
31,027 posts, read 22,064,322 times
Reputation: 19073
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
You're right. I can't understand why Clinton even mentioned her name.
Because she is Nuts
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2019, 07:45 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,368,531 times
Reputation: 11375
Quote:
Originally Posted by finalmove View Post
This is a serious charge coming from a former Secretary of State. She will regret it. Can't even imagine how Bill Clinton tolerates her stupidity at this point.
Do you know how much money Hillary has? A defamation lawsuit would be so much fun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2019, 08:18 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,368,531 times
Reputation: 11375
It is true that some people imagine conspiracies that don't exist, but it's also true that there are a lot of real conspiracies in this world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2019, 11:22 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,665,061 times
Reputation: 7943
I wouldn't be surprised. Gabbard has defended Russia and Putin on numerous occasions. I have no doubt that she will lose her next congressional election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2019, 11:56 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 21 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,549 posts, read 16,536,658 times
Reputation: 6032
Quote:
Originally Posted by boneyard1962 View Post
I agree with your conclusions completely. That however doesn't influence who I will vote for, I mean other than who not to vote for. I watched the DNC and the democrat part pull their crap on Bernie last time. It really was eye opening. For me it's almost to the point: If the party backs a candidate run away and vote for someone else.

Some say that doing a write in is a waste of a vote. I disagree. The wasted vote is for someone you feel doesn't represent your beliefs, but the party backs. That is a wasted vote. Better to not vote at all.
1. your eyes are apparently completely shut and dreaming. Bernie lost because he and his supporters were in the minority. plain and simple.

2. someone has to win the primary, so im not sure how your statement on "if the party backs a candidate" actually works in your mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top