Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You know the TDS crowd is desperate when they start throwing around "bribery" and "treason." As if Stormy-gate, Russia-gate, racist-gate, emoluments-gate, tax return-gate, etc. etc. etc. weren't enough to reveal them as the hyperpartisan desperate sore losers they are.
You know the TDS crowd is desperate when they start throwing around "bribery" and "treason." As if Stormy-gate, Russia-gate, racist-gate, emoluments-gate, tax return-gate, etc. etc. etc. weren't enough to reveal them as the hyperpartisan desperate sore losers they are.
Technically, I think what Trump is accused of doing is more accurately described as extortion, vs. bribery.
Breaking into a SCIF would get a normal Joe arrested - perhaps even shot, depending on the SCIF.
Let's remember that the next time one of these clownshoes who participated today brings up Hillary's emails.
I'm pretty sure Congressional representatives have TS clearances and then some, but nice try. Nobody is getting arrested for hearing information they are cleared to hear. Although the Democrats should have their clearances yanked because all they do is leak classified information.
Leftists are such boring souls. Any little tidbit of "news" that they have something on Trump gets Leftists all worked up over nothing. Trump will leave office Jan 2025. Just accept it and move on.
No problem. We're all lagging behind the news cycle now and again. This week has been busier than most.
well, this morning on my main media news source - the Today Show - they gave it the "we obtained a copy" . .... maybe even "a copy of part of his opening statement."
I'm pretty sure Congressional representatives have TS clearances and then some, but nice try. Nobody is getting arrested for hearing information they are cleared to hear. Although the Democrats should have their clearances yanked because all they do is leak classified information.
I have a "TS clearance and then some". Can I just break into that SCIF, too?
A clearance is only one piece of the puzzle.
Further, I'm pretty sure you're wrong about the TS clearance, bit:
House members, beginning with the 104th Congress, do have to take a secrecy oath. Members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence – the committee with oversight over intelligence agencies including the CIA and NSA – have a separate oath, commensurate with their unique access to sensitive information. Again, these oaths take the way of a public pledge, vice the arduous security-clearance process, complete with SF86, undertaken by the average security-cleared professional.
well, this morning on my main media news source - the Today Show - they gave it the "we obtained a copy" . .... maybe even "a copy of part of his opening statement."
Yeah, I'm honestly not sure if the 15 pages released was the entirety of the opening statement or not. I believe I heard the same "part of the opening statement" reporting, but I'm not sure.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
