Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
well, this morning on my main media news source - the Today Show - they gave it the "we obtained a copy" . .... maybe even "a copy of part of his opening statement."
I feel truly bad for anyone who would say this about themselves and actually be serious about it.
I feel truly bad for anyone who would say this about themselves and actually be serious about it.
eh, I'm self-employed and out the door from 8-ish until 8-ish. somebody's got to generate the taxes. I read the WSJ, NYT, and some of the local rag online as well. I didn't say I get my opinion from them, just the news I see.
The Supreme Court did not rule on this exact circumstance.
There is a requirement that in order for a matter to proceed, it must have a majority of yea votes.
Three times voted down.
House Committee Heads who are proceeding in violation of an established practice don't have any discretion. That's' why Schiff is now publically being called out on it.
You think the Repubs went into that room today as a lark ?
So bucko, o for 3
As you already know that isn't needed for the inquiry.
Breaking into a SCIF would get a normal Joe arrested - perhaps even shot, depending on the SCIF.
Let's remember that the next time one of these clownshoes who participated today brings up Hillary's emails.
Anyone who stormed in there today in this stunt should lose any security clearances they have. And yes, I would say the same if Democrats did the same. They have the whole SCIF setup for a reason.
I'm pretty sure Congressional representatives have TS clearances and then some, but nice try. Nobody is getting arrested for hearing information they are cleared to hear. Although the Democrats should have their clearances yanked because all they do is leak classified information.
There are both Dems and Reps in these hearings. Those who stormed the hearings are a bunch of snowflakes trying to make their little commander in chief feel better.
Anyone who stormed in there today in this stunt should lose any security clearances they have. And yes, I would say the same if Democrats did the same. They have the whole SCIF setup for a reason.
They don't have clearances, per se, but I agree that they should lose all access to classified material above, say, FOUO, for a period of time at least.
They don't have clearances, per se, but I agree that they should lose all access to classified material above, say, FOUO, for a period of time at least.
When I was doing contracting work for the gov, if I had busted into a SCIF I wasn't cleared for during a classified meeting I didn't have access to while tweeting about doing so on my cell phone, I would have most likely gone to jail for some period of time, lost my security clearance permanently, and lost my job.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
hey n00b...
