Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wait, isn?€™t the crime rate, particularly violence crime rate, among the poor is like 1000 times of the rich?
Not when you consider the wars they have started and/or promoted, deaths resulting from mind control by tobacco companies via adding addictive substances for no other reason then to make it much more difficult then it otherwise would be for people from being able to stop buying their products after they became aware of the risks to their health, and countless other such episodes, some known, many undoubtedly not. With no prison terms for executives resulting from that, of course.
Last edited by robertbrianbush; 10-26-2019 at 10:05 AM..
I'm glad. The last thing Amazon needs is more power. The more people buy from Amazon, the less competition we will have.
So should we award defense aerospace contracts to lesser companies because Lockheed and Boeing have too much power? You realize we are not talking about the Amazon store here? This is their cloud software.
Amazon has the cheaper and more efficient cloud, sadly once again the government will get the inferior product due to nothing but politics.
Can you explain the technical reasons that make AWS a better option than Microsoft Azure in this instance, pay particular attention to the projects goals and requirements.
Bear in mind the article you linked to (NextGov) is obsolete in regards to government security certifications. Azure already hosts DISA in its Office 365 Government Defense cloud.
Or are you taking market share are the metric? Which doesnt really determine capability, but perceived cost?
I'm not in any way disparaging AWS, it's a good tight system with some limitations that are not insurmountable. However I wouldn't dream of claiming it's better than another service unconditionally without detailed understanding of requirements, goals, and current technology practices of the development team.
Well, we can all be glad that Bezos' Amazon's lost out, since it's an ultra-rich company which has shown a lack of respect for people's privacy. Much better to choose Gates' Microsoft, a poor struggling company which has always had the best interest of Americans at heart.
It’s not from the benevolence of the butcher that our meat is provided but from his regard for his own self interest. ( condensed Adam Smith)
Maybe that's why Google, Microsoft...choose Indian-born leaders not Americans. They are less likely to be involved in politics.
Why would Indian-born leaders be less likely involved in politics than American born? And why would Google and Microsoft care? They don't hire Americans because they're un-American globalist a-holes is more likely.
Can you imagine satellites and military equipment being ran by software from Microsoft that crashes due to weather?
If satellites and military equipment cannot be used because a data center shut down then a whole bunch of people at the DOD need to be fired.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
?
