Washington Post calls Al-Baghdadi an "austere religious scholar" (Iraq, Pelosi)

[DannyHobkins]

Exactly what the left thinks of this man. Nevermind the fact that Democrat leadership heads are spinning trying to supress the defeat.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill...ing-isis%3famp

[Sydney123]

He’s even holier now!

[ambient]

Yes, and that's why they went after Bin Laden and expanded combat zones when Obama was President, because they loved the radical Muslims.

Your lies are just that...lies.

[DannyHobkins]

Originally Posted by ambient

Yes, and that's why they went after Bin Laden and expanded combat zones when Obama was President, because they loved the radical Muslims.

Your lies are just that...lies.

Dont comment if you didnt read the article.

[ambient]

Originally Posted by DannyHobkins

Dont comment if you didnt read the article.

You're the one who just implied that Democrats are pro-terrorist based on the Post's stupid headlines. Don't comment like that and I won't comment the way I did.

[Joe the Photog]

Originally Posted by DannyHobkins

Exactly what the left thinks of this man.

Thread fail. One headline in a newspaper somewhere does not define how people feel

[DannyHobkins]

Originally Posted by ambient

You're the one who just implied that Democrats are pro-terrorist based on the Post's stupid headlines. Don't comment like that and I won't comment the way I did.

Simply put, yes if you remain loyal to a party that calls a terrorist leader an "austere religious scholar" without renouncing it youre guilty. Read Nancy Pelosi or any of the front runners very weak words against the man.

[subaru5555]

If I didn’t know any better, I’d say the alt-right are trying to poison/prevent moderates from voting left.

[Joe the Photog]

Originally Posted by DannyHobkins

Simply put, yes if you remain loyal to a party that calls a terrorist leader an "austere religious scholar" without renouncing it youre guilty. Read Nancy Pelosi or any of the front runners very weak words against the man.

One newspaper called him that. They do not speak for anyone but themselves. You are terribly reaching trying to say all Democrats feel this way. It's asinine to think that

[ambient]

Originally Posted by DannyHobkins

Simply put, yes if you remain loyal to a party that calls a terrorist leader an "austere religious scholar" without renouncing it youre guilty. Read Nancy Pelosi or any of the front runners very weak words against the man.

Then explain to me why Obama admin conducted wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and also killed Bin Laden and a bunch of other terrorists during those years if they are so sympathetic to terrorists.

It takes a great deal of delusion to ignore history like this.

What am I guilty of, being a reasonable adult willing to take historical facts into consideration before making dumb blanket accusations?