Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That would be something of a cellmate two-fer for Manafort since he'd also be sharing it with the face of Richard Nixon that Stone has tattooed on his back.
Stone’s lawyers also pointed out that he had offered to answer any other questions the House had, but at no point did anyone ask him about Corsi until he was charged.
Prosecutors claimed Stone did not tell the House about Jerome Corsi contacting Wikileaks, but Stone’s lawyers pointed out Corsi had no actual contact with Wikileaks and was not credible.
Stone’s defense was not “so what” - his defense was that his only go-between with Wikileaks was Credico, which is what he had testified to the House.
Whether this constitutes a false statement or not, it is the substance of the charge, but this juror completely mischaracterizes the entire issue and flippantly disregards the facts at issue here - just as the prosecution wanted them to.
Stones emails were all you really needed here. He lied and his emails showed it, what defense was there to make. It was Stones word against Stones word, they didn’t even need to call a witness.
They railroaded an innocent man. This was revenge, not Justice.
please cite exactly where in the article the juror "admits he didn't care what the defense said" because i'm seeing the exact opposite:
"We listened carefully to the testimony of a series of witnesses and carefully examined every element of every charge and its defense, and we unanimously agreed that each had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt"
and
"I am proud that we took Roger Stone’s rights seriously and that we treated the government’s assertions skeptically."
please cite exactly where in the article the juror "admits he didn't care what the defense said" because i'm seeing the exact opposite:
"We listened carefully to the testimony of a series of witnesses and carefully examined every element of every charge and its defense, and we unanimously agreed that each had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt"
and
"I am proud that we took Roger Stone’s rights seriously and that we treated the government’s assertions skeptically."
LMAO - another failed thread by BB. Apparently BB doesn't read his own link outside of the headline.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Roger Stone Juror Admits He Didn't Care What The Defense Said
