Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So you are saying that they have to come here legally though, right? If not, then you are for open borders.
You don't get thru the border(s) unless you're thoroughly documented, no criminal record anywhere, and you're not a potential burden. Otherwise an American, for example, can live and work freely anywhere he or she wants from Tierra del Fuego to Alaska.
Libertarians may want open borders, but they also want no social services.
Hell, if we had no social services, I would be fine with open borders too. And I am not a libertarian.
You cant mix and match libertarianism with socialism and use that as an example. It is a false example.
Libertarianism only works as a package deal, which is probably the main reason I am not a libertarian.
I wouldn't be for open borders because not all illegals are coming here for the social services or jobs. Certainly criminals, the drug runners and terrorists aren't coming here for those things.
This is why it boggles my mind why anybody votes Democrat these days. People actually want millions of lower-class, uneducated people from crime-ridden third world countries to flood into the United States forever?
So many Americans have gone to the lunatic fringe.
Any politician that doesn’t abide by existing immigration laws should be immediately arrested and prosecuted. The same for law enforcement. Sanctuary cities or states should not be allowed to exist. Then you have people voting for these traitors.
Are Democrats so stupid that they do not recognize the important of preserving culture, or does immigration to the USA make no difference and not change culture? Do immigrants set up small fiefdoms with others from the same country in the USA?
that's 'racist.'
Quote:
Originally Posted by in_newengland
No. You don't understand the difference between not wanting a useless wall and open borders. They shouldn't be here, no drivers licenses, no free healthcare...I've never known a Dem who wants any of that. We have laws and the laws need to be obeyed.
Guess this is just another one of those deflections. Next?
you've never heard of the dozen-plus 2020 democratic candidates for president?
I wouldn't be for open borders because not all illegals are coming here for the social services or jobs. Certainly criminals, the drug runners and terrorists aren't coming here for those things.
They are like Willie Sutton. They come to where the money is. And that's not Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo
Who are these "open border types" you speak of?
Other than a figment of right wing imaginations, I mean.
I have a hypothetical that will let you know whether or not you are an “open border type”.
There is a massive earthquake. Miraculously, and thankfully, nobody is hurt, but it creates an insurmountable crevice in the earth along the US/Mexico border.
We build some bridges along the legal entry points. So now the ONLY way to come into the country from the south, is legally.
Are you happy about the outcome, or unhappy about the outcome?
If you find that you are unhappy about the outcome, then you are an “open border type”.
If you dont like my scenario, you can use any scenario that completely eliminates entry, other than at legal points of entry. Imagine a 100 foot tall, 10 feet thick titanium wall. It doesn’t have to be realistic for these purposes. It is just to assess whether or not you want people coming here illegally or not.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.