Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Is it possible that liberal males, assuming they never used force on a woman, do not realize the strength discrepancy? Sounds like a ridiculous question, but if you've never been in a position to force a woman (or conversely, had force used on you, as a woman), you might not realize it. It's a massive difference.
So....I challenge you liberal males: go out in your neighborhood right now, and grab the hand of the first woman you see. Do not let go. See if she can escape you grasp. Unless you've accidently picked on Martina Navratilova, it won't even be close.
...if a young man wakes up one morning and believes he's a squirrel, is he a squirrel, no he's mentally ill...just continue the logic, it's not difficult...
What if I want to identify as an apache attack helicopter?
When you allow biological males to be female athletes you'll find that pretty quickly all of the best female athletes will be biologically male.
Of course, that's why they need to put an end to that nonsense once and for all. Let transgender individuals be their own category if that's a solution but a trans female has no business being allowed to compete with actual women.
No she's not the greatest athlete in history. I think Jackie Joyner Kersey would be a contender, as well as Nadia Komanechi. The Williams sisters are definitely in the running. There's too many to list. Caitlin doesn't get a nod, not bcuz of her sitrep, but bcuz she doesn't exude athleticism.
She set an olympic record with 8618 points back in 1976 (43 years ago).
The next highest womens score to this day is almost 300 points lower.
But hey, let me know how much athleticism a roughly 70 year old person should "exude" before you consider them lol.
Now if you'd said she lacked Farhfergnugen then sure.....that would have been a better argument.
P.S. All of this is of course predicated on letting trans compete against women which I personally do not support and have not seen a coherent argument in favor of to this day. The very separation of gender was designed to avoid inherent physical advantages that remain regardless of identity. That's why you also have age ranges for some events.
I can respect how someone identifies and their sex life and identity is none of my business. However, sports should be separated by basic biology, or well....do away with any biological definition and watch all womens sporting die off.
When you allow biological males to be female athletes you'll find that pretty quickly all of the best female athletes will be biologically male.
Of course, that's why they need to put an end to that nonsense once and for all. Let transgender individuals be their own category if that's a solution but a trans female has no business being allowed to compete with actual women.
Yup...there will eventually be two teams: one of biological males, and one of transgendered females. Real women won't stand a chance.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
