Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So, we should just assume there is an investigation into the Bidens, because......?
Of course that's what we have, that's the point of an inquiry.
Sure, go down that road. I'm sure it'll serve you well. Never mind Trump taking out all ambiguity of what he wanted in front of the cameras on the White House lawn:
“If they (the Ukrainian govmt) were honest about it, they would start a major investigation into the Bidens,” Trump said. “Likewise, China should start an investigation into the Bidens. Because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine.”
That is not advocating for cracking down on general "corruption". That is not asking for "assistance" in ongoing investigations.
Assume nothing . You don't know what you don't know. That goes double for the Government. As I asked, are Americans aware that fellow Americans are still being held hostage in Iran ? That it was known during the " negotiations" for the Nuclear Deal ? What else don't we know? Why do you think all those foreign lobbyists and lawyers set up shop in DC ? For the fine dining options?
An inquiry based on " suspicion" orchestrated by opinion regarding foreign policy and procedures by an elected representative of the people. Our taxpayer dollars at stake.
Where in the Constitution , under the Powers of the President are these types of requests forbidden ?
Where in the Constitution does it say that Government Employees have the Power to involve themselves in foreign policy decisions and actions ?
A Parade of Opinions that are different than the POTUS's . That's your witness list.
Let me dumb it down for ya. trump used Congressional appropriated funds for personal reasons to bribe a president of another country.
No, he is ALLEGED to have used "Congressional appropriated funds" (but pretty clearly didn't) to get the president of another country to investigate an instance in which it appears Biden "used Congressional appropriated funds for personal reasons to bribe a president of another country".
No, he is ALLEGED to have used "Congressional appropriated funds" (but pretty clearly didn't) to get the president of another country to investigate an instance in which it appears Biden "used Congressional appropriated funds for personal reasons to bribe a president of another country".
Again, it was not for personal reasons, he had the full backing of the US government and our European allies in ousting Shokin.
No one has suggested there ever was an investigation into Hunter Biden and no one ever requested one.
Hunter Biden's role in this is that he was hired to a high paid job he wasn't qualified for by a corrupt company as a way to purchase a favor from his father. The corrupt company was worried about an investigation by a Ukrainian prosecutor that threatened the company so they bought Joe Biden to flex the muscles of his office to fire the prosecutor and get the investigation shut down by the new and more corrupt prosecutor..... and that's exactly what happened.
The investigation was always into Burisma, not any Biden.
Not according to the transcript the White House released of that "perfect call."
^^^Ridiculous! That government website is from the office of the Inspector General. I think that website is more informed of the legal process than a daytime poster ^^^^.
Our Inspector General
WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION INFORMATION
Let me explain it to you again. That's an article not a statute.
The claim that Ciaramella is a whistleblower depends on a specific statute (5 USC 3033), which does not support the claim that he is a whistleblower since what he reported was not within the scope of the statute.
^^^Ridiculous! That government website is from the office of the Inspector General. I think that website is more informed of the legal process than a daytime poster ^^^^.
Our Inspector General
WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION INFORMATION
That is not "from the office of the Inspector General". It is from the website for the Office of Personnel Management", which has its own inspector general. There are lots of inspector generals. There is no single "Office of the Inspector General".
Ciaramella made his report to the IG for the intelligence community even though what he reported had nothing to do with the way the intelligence community was being run. It's a sham.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
