Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,587,616 times
Reputation: 9169
Advertisements
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory
Not only that but how did they communicate with their parents if they didn't know the language of their homelands? They learned it from their parents! Many I'm sure still have relatives in their homelands. Most DACAs were brought here after the age of six, so yes they did know their homelands. It's a lame argument anyway since people move all over the world and adapt to their new surroundings. [B)The DACAs have been taught the language and the culture of their homelands by their parents.[/b]
"We anticipate that the Court will likely issue its decision close to the end of June 2020, but it could come as early as January 2020 — and the exact timing is difficult to predict."
Imagine being on a 2 year reprieve from the law and deciding "well, I think I'll have a baby! I may not be here in 2 years, but my baby will be a citizen. and taken care of! By ... somebody else!"
Yes, imagine people wanting to have children. How outrageous.
The end of birthright citizenship is and should be a non starter. If either party really wanted to end illegal immigration, they could do so fairly easily but there's no support for it.
Republicans refuse to go after employers, Democrats want open borders
open voters that is. Which means that both parties are essentially the treason party. There's a reason so many in his party don't like Trump. He's an America firster.
Modern politicians and other heavy-hitters are get rich firsters.
"We anticipate that the Court will likely issue its decision close to the end of June 2020, but it could come as early as January 2020 — and the exact timing is difficult to predict."
Again, example: I was born in New York, only lived there until I was 18, but have lived in Arizona longer than I lived in NY at this point. Am I still a New Yorker?.....
Difference is, you moved to Arizona legally and have lived there legally.
I'm trying to make a point, someone who came to the US before they could walk or say their first words would have no remembrance or understanding of the country they were born in, never would have gone to school there, never would have worked there, never would have made friends or acquaintances there, etc. All their ties and what they know would be here in the United States. Your line of argument is bureaucratic to the max
The typical sob story that actually applies to only a tiny fraction of DACA members. And given the slow rate of assimilation in illegals, nearly all of them would have been raised in the culture of their homeland.
If you were brought to US at 5 yr old, and now you are 30 and have no clue where your parents are, then you can't just walk to an embassy of some country and tell them you need a passport, because your parents are from there. They would require proof.
If proof of country of birth is required by those countries, it should be required by ours too.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
