Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You are correct, you just don't get it. A president cannot use his office for anything that relates to his campaign. Using tax paid congressional appropriated funding intended for our national security to coerce a recipient country's president to make a public announcement that trump's opponents son is under investigation (which he was not), is doing just that.
The president of Ukraine has said in multiple interviews that he was not coerced, there was no quid pro quo, there were no conditions tied to the aid.
This is nothing but your faux Trump-Russian collusion 2.0. Your TDS has convinced you that up is down, and black is white, and no amount of fact based evidence will sway you.
We have the evidence of the transcript, we have the evidence of President Zelensky's own word, we do not need hearsay witnesses, nor do we need people with corrupted memories claiming they heard the exact opposite.
what's wrong to investigate a democrat? It is his duty to investigate and show the corrupt democrats. also, The democrats spent millions of tax payer money to investigate their political opponent Trump. how abuse of power is that?
The president of Ukraine has said in multiple interviews that he was not coerced, there was no quid pro quo, there were no conditions tied to the aid.
This is nothing but your faux Trump-Russian collusion 2.0. Your TDS has convinced you that up is down, and black is white, and no amount of fact based evidence will sway you.
We have the evidence of the transcript, we have the evidence of President Zelensky's own word, we do not need hearsay witnesses, nor do we need people with corrupted memories claiming they heard the exact opposite.
FYI, "Interviews" are not under oath.
Let trump testify under oath just as president Clinton did.
Does that apply to Democrats, or only Republicans?
Ah....if you actually read article II of the constitution (it isn't too long), you would find that it relates only to the "president" of the US be it a republican or democrat.
BTW, I am surprised your conservative sources have not educated you about this part of the constitution.
Let trump testify under oath just as president Clinton did.
When it gets to the senate, that gets to happen. But it sounds like Trump wants his attorney present here.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
