Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Trump still has the capacity to surprise with this unfettered tweeting. Here you have this witness describing how she's been shot at in the service of the country and what do you get from Trump, in a real-time tweet no less while she's testifying:
Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad. She started off in Somalia, how did that go? ...
No no no, according to this Harvard professor (who is clearly biased if you read his tweets) you can’t say anything to defend yourself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks
You haven't told us what Trump is supposedly defending himself from. What did this diplomat do? He is the POTUS, and according to supporters, can do absolutely anything he wants. So what did Yovanovitch say or do to Trump that warranted him "defending himself?" We're waiting. . .
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee
That's the lefts job...and you are right, we are waiting, been waiting for 3 years.....yawn.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks
Another "I got nothing" from the Always Trumpers, huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee
Another, guilty until trumps proves he is innocent from the Always Anti-trumper….
Deflection #5,000,000. I asked Trump supporters one simple thing and it has nothing to do with guilt or innocence. What does Trump need to supposedly defend himself from? Why would he go on Twitter and bash a woman who never said anything about him? Even if she was the worst employee in history, that is no reason to smear her. He should have terminated her quietly like classy bosses do. But because he's Trump, it's OK, right? And you can't even come up with proof of your original claim, that he needed to "defend" himself from her for some reason you haven't figured out yet.
Deflection #5,000,000. I asked Trump supporters one simple thing and it has nothing to do with guilt or innocence. What does Trump need to supposedly defend himself from? Why would he go on Twitter and bash a woman who never said anything about him? Even if she was the worst employee in history, that is no reason to smear her. He should have terminated her quietly like classy bosses do. But because he's Trump, it's OK, right? And you can't even come up with proof of your original claim, that he needed to "defend" himself from her for some reason you haven't figured out yet.
Why are they spending hours of hearings listening to the testimony of a fired, disgruntled employee?
What purpose does anybody think this serves?
The left's/Dem's mode of cognition is "emoting;" they don't have critical thinking skills or think logically, so, they're appealing to their voter base which has the cognitive ability of a toddler.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.