Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
His testimony will start leaking tonight, and he will more than likely be scheduled to testify publicly next week. Once he does, Mulvaney will have to decide whether to shut up and sink or 'fess up and swim.
POTUS needs no reason, just like Obama needed no reason when he fired the Bush-appointed Ambassadors. HOW do you not get that?
New administrations are always replacing ambassadors mostly political donors, do you know who the replacement is for Yovanovitch or for that matter Taylor and Volker. This isn't the ambassador to the Bahamas, they are at war with Russia and Trump has no replacement and disparaged her in front of Zellensky and claimed she was bad without any details.
Giuliani and his hit men wanted her out, Russia couldn't have done a better job to get rid of a strong anti-corruption ambassador if they tried. Why the presidents counsel and his associates are wandering around Ukraine and Europe attempting to get rid of an ambassador is one for the record books, they accomplished what the oligarchs couldn't and Russia must be pleased.
I cant wait to see her replacement, maybe Sondland has another friend in the hotel business or maybe he should take over himself since he has such an avid interest in Ukraine.
So this guy CHOOSING to testify must think he has something of value to offer or why bother. He'll become a target for either side depending on what he says. Who would want to put themselves into that position.
Just responding to your posts....I don't get paid no matter how many people in this and other threads say people are paid...your ASSumption is, well uselss.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog
My point seems pretty clear to me and no one said he is not running again, thus the use of the word "if" in my post. I do not know the future. Maybe you do
When they are finally drawn, it will be a mixture of these. Your guess is as good as mine as to how many of them will actually appear in Articles of Impeachment.
The balance of them will appear on state indictments filed in New York.
Treason
Conspiracy against the United States
Obstruction of Justice
Inciting Violence
Racketeering
Sexual Assault
Dereliction of Duty
Perjury of Oath
Bribery/ Extortion
Witness Tampering
Bank Fraud
Insurance Fraud
Money Laundering
Witness Tampering
Emoluments violations.
Election Fraud
Witness Intimidation
Lying to Mueller
Tax Fraud/Evasion
Wire Fraud
Not what was asked, but your wishes as still useless, thanks for playing.
His testimony will start leaking tonight, and he will more than likely be scheduled to testify publicly next week. Once he does, Mulvaney will have to decide whether to shut up and sink or 'fess up and swim.
Yes, your fellow dems/libs/lefties will absolutely start leaking what was said behind closed doors.....Nothing has stopped them before.
The ambassador clearly was not skilled for the job. She can talk nice but to me she rightfully was recalled.
Meanwhile she is still getting paid and can’t deal with being a professional on the world stage.
Trump made a very wise decision and his tweet was not witness tempering as if Schiff hadn’t mention the tweet, she wouldn’t have know until after the hearing. Nothing in the tweet is/was threatening. Clearly she is a light weight.
So this guy CHOOSING to testify must think he has something of value to offer or why bother. He'll become a target for either side depending on what he says. Who would want to put themselves into that position.
Why is it behind closed doors? Let it be public.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.