Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-25-2019, 02:42 PM
 
8,502 posts, read 3,341,588 times
Reputation: 7030

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
CNN.


hahahahahahahaha
You are behind. The NYT interviewed Firtash and Kolomoisky directly. So now it's time for NYT:

hahahahahahahaha

And there are some tapes and video now submitted to House Intel. So more:

hahahahahahahaha

Now I doubt Giuliani will flip nor the Senate force him to testify, so no doubt in the end it will be Trump going:

hahahahahahahaha

 
Old 11-25-2019, 02:45 PM
 
8,502 posts, read 3,341,588 times
Reputation: 7030
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbmaise View Post
Such a happy crew all having multiple lunches undoubted paid for by Firtash

Trump's attorney Giuliani seeking Ukrainian assistance to get dirt on Biden

Devin Nunes' aide fresh from European trip on taxpayer dollars to get dirt on Biden

Firtash's two attorneys making sure Firtash muscles into play to avoid prosecution and or Ukrainian gas position?

Parnas willing to tell all.

Journalist Soloman somehow forgetting to document the meetings in the press.

https://www.cnn.ph/world/2019/11/24/...tor-biden.html
Actually, Firtash may be running low on funds. A portion of the $170 million in bonds he had to put up to the Austrians was covered by a Russian mafia figure he's tied to. At least the cost for Nunes and his 'investigators' to fly to Vienna was covered by U.S. taxpayers.
 
Old 11-25-2019, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,897,671 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by cachibatches View Post
I am not sure what the point is, but why shouldn't they be happy?

1. Trump's approval rating went up five points during the hearings.
2. Support for impeachment dropped corresponding five points.
3. Support for impeachment is minimal in swing states.
4. Republican Senators are planning to draw out impeachment should it happens to keep Warren and Sanders from campaigning, and to sabotage Biden, who will be called as witness.
5. The dems failed to produce one witness claiming to have witnessed an actual crime or heard the president ask for a quid pro quo.

And, most important of all...

6. As dems have wasted their time shooting themselves on the foot, Trump and the RNC have amassed a massive war chest of 100 million, several tens of millions of which has been spent already creating infrastructure in battleground and light blue states to identify Republican votes and get them to the polls.

The DNC, but contrast, has only amassed 8 million with 7 million debt, and all monies collected by the candidates are going to fight each other in a very messy primary which could last a very long time.

So yeah, they are pretty happy, because it is beginning to look pretty good for them. I believe that the dems better pick a very electable candidate by Super Tuesday, or they might as well fold up shop for the cycle. They are letting it slip though their fingers.
Which polls are you going by to come up with that conclusion? He has sit at a high of 44% for sometime with most polling showing 40%. 538 has his favorability at 41.7%, 42.something for likely voters.
 
Old 11-25-2019, 03:17 PM
 
8,502 posts, read 3,341,588 times
Reputation: 7030
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbmaise View Post
How about new Law & Crime article about how natural gas CEO from Ukraine is willing to testify as to what Trump's lawyer and associates tried to do in the Ukraine?

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile...-giuliani/amp/
Kobolyev (the Naftogaz CEO) says Parnas, Fruman, Giuliani and their various activities are all connected. An associate of the individual (another Naftogaz senior official) that Parnas and Fruman approached to replace Kobolyev for a share of the anticipated profits instead went to Federal authorities. This guy said somewhere that Parnas and Fruman did not begin to understand the gas market.

Parnas is broke but found enough money for his company (Fraud Guarantee) to pay Rudy Giuliani $500,000. Giuliani keeps announcing he has no business deals in Ukraine - he used to say with Parnas but apparently has dropped that part of his denial.

That there are no completed Ukrainian deals may be true, however. This appears to be the gang that can't shoot straight with Giuliani's efforts on behalf of his so-called client now bringing Trump to the breach of impeachment.
 
Old 11-25-2019, 07:30 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,580 posts, read 56,482,264 times
Reputation: 23386
According to Rasumussen, Trump has a 55% DISAPPROVAL rating as of 11/24 - after the hearings.

If Rasumussen shows that number, how bad, really, is it for him?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...oval-6179.html

Tuned in to Hannity briefly tonight - talk about another planet. Hannity was talking complete nonsense with zero supporting evidence. Nunes was on, looking very thin. Can we say he's under a lot of pressure? lol.......

And viewership if impeachment hearings averaged about 12,000,000 - again contrary to what Nunes outrageously inappropriate comments - actually lies - to the witnesses last week.
 
Old 11-25-2019, 09:10 PM
 
Location: TUS/PDX
7,824 posts, read 4,565,821 times
Reputation: 8854
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenBouy View Post
What would be the logical reason to “get dirt” on Biden 4 months before he announced he was running for President?
You don't believe both parties have running dossiers and playbooks on possible opposition candidates at all times? Sweet summer child.
 
Old 11-26-2019, 12:20 AM
 
Location: Big Island of Hawaii & HOT BuOYS Sailing Vessel
5,277 posts, read 2,800,352 times
Reputation: 1932
SDNY subpoenas have now been issued to Giuliani.

I am sure he is thrilled they are coming from the same office he used to lead.

The interesting thing about them they list the crimes he is being investigated for. A whole boat load of them.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn...tes/index.html

charges encompassed in the subpoena include conspiracy to defraud the US, acting as an unregistered foreign agent, obstruction of justice, making false statements to federal officials, wire fraud, money laundering and violations of federal election laws that prohibit the use of straw donors and foreign money in US elections.

But I am sure Giuliani and his GOP associates sleep well at night after all that steak they ate at the BLT Prime.

I checked the menu. They have a 40 Oz steak for 2. And at just $140 the potatoes is $26 more. Again for two. But looks like Pompeo was trying to make eat it by himself.

Last edited by pbmaise; 11-26-2019 at 12:54 AM..
 
Old 11-26-2019, 05:37 AM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariadne22 View Post
According to Rasumussen, Trump has a 55% DISAPPROVAL rating as of 11/24 - after the hearings.

If Rasumussen shows that number, how bad, really, is it for him?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...oval-6179.html

Tuned in to Hannity briefly tonight - talk about another planet. Hannity was talking complete nonsense with zero supporting evidence. Nunes was on, looking very thin. Can we say he's under a lot of pressure? lol.......

And viewership if impeachment hearings averaged about 12,000,000 - again contrary to what Nunes outrageously inappropriate comments - actually lies - to the witnesses last week.
Why is Nunes not under an ethics investigation?
 
Old 11-26-2019, 05:44 AM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariadne22 View Post
According to Rasumussen, Trump has a 55% DISAPPROVAL rating as of 11/24 - after the hearings.

If Rasumussen shows that number, how bad, really, is it for him?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...oval-6179.html

Tuned in to Hannity briefly tonight - talk about another planet. Hannity was talking complete nonsense with zero supporting evidence. Nunes was on, looking very thin. Can we say he's under a lot of pressure? lol.......

And viewership if impeachment hearings averaged about 12,000,000 - again contrary to what Nunes outrageously inappropriate comments - actually lies - to the witnesses last week.
Rasmussen has Trump with a disapproval of 55%?

Had to check for myself. Sure enough.

Rasmussen has disapproval numbers at 55%.

Political also at 55%.

Reuters at 56%.

This is before most people have had time to absorb not only the testimony but the news coming-out about Giuliani and Nunes, and polling companies have had time to contact people and gather stats.
 
Old 11-26-2019, 05:45 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,381,866 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Why is Nunes not under an ethics investigation?
That may well be in Nunes' future.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top