Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-10-2019, 03:33 AM
 
Location: New York Area
35,062 posts, read 17,006,525 times
Reputation: 30212

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
Slightly off-topic, but Democrats who support the anti-Israel BDS movement or otherwise seek to weaken Israel have often said to me that the only reason far-right Christians support Israel is due to their belief in End Times, Rapture, whatever - and that they really care nothing about Jews. My response to that has always been that if I have a choice between Christian Evangelists who support Israel for the wrong reasons and secular Democrats who are willing to sacrifice Israel for the wrong reasons, I'll go with the former.
Spot on. And not as off-topic as you think.

FDR was allegedly more "friendly" to Jews socially than most Republicans. That proved not to be important when actual issues arose that needed those warm and fuzzy feelings turned into action.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-23-2021, 04:55 PM
 
34,048 posts, read 17,064,521 times
Reputation: 17205
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
FDR has been a long-time hero to the Jewish people. My family had been FDR worshipers until then. My mother was born November 7, 1932, the day before Election Day that year. My mother's name was lengthened from "Ruth" to "Ruthellen" in honor of Eleanor Roosevelt. At that point FDR's election was virtually inevitable. My father and his family were wildly admiring of him.

Since roughly 1968, when While Six Million Died: A Chronicle of American Apathy by Arthur D. Morse came out, it was painfully obvious that he was anything but. Indeed, he said what people, including the American people, the Jews and Hitler wanted to hear. In in February-March 1973 I read the referenced book. Even before his now-famous rejection of the ship the St. Louis his state department found that virtually all Jewish immigrants were "likely to become a public charge."

About two years ago I read 1944: FDR and the Year That Changed History by Jay Winik. That book and other reading cemented my view that despite some tepid "efforts" such as the War Refugee Board, Roosevelt almost preferred to have the "Jewish problem" finally resolved overseas by ensuring that most Jewish captives did not survive. At the end of his career there was the refusal to bomb the rail links to the death camps. Last but certainly not least was his promise to ibn Saud not to allow a Middle Eastern Jewish state. Fortunately Truman thought better after FDR descended either into a grave or further down into the fires underground.

The Jews is many respect are their own worst enemy. They give aid and comfort to those who give them lip service. And by the way hate Donald Trump. Totally counter-intuitive.
Amen. Morse's book should be required reading in every school in the nation, btw.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2021, 04:59 PM
 
34,048 posts, read 17,064,521 times
Reputation: 17205
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post

About two years ago I read 1944: FDR and the Year That Changed History by Jay Winik. That book and other reading cemented my view that despite some tepid "efforts" such as the War Refugee Board, Roosevelt almost preferred to have the "Jewish problem" finally resolved overseas by ensuring that most Jewish captives did not survive. At the end of his career there was the refusal to bomb the rail links to the death camps. Last but certainly not least was his promise to ibn Saud not to allow a Middle Eastern Jewish state. Fortunately Truman thought better after FDR descended either into a grave or further down into the fires underground.
Truman was a rare, non Anti-Semite in the Democratic party. If only he were POTUS in 1939, there is no way IMO he would have said no to the St. Louis docking. He had a pair, unlike the POTUS he served under.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2021, 05:13 PM
 
4,190 posts, read 2,508,104 times
Reputation: 6571
Part of the FDR legacy is that when it came to it, there were two main choices up until Pearl Harbor, the German sympathetic isolationists with anti-Semitic leanings and FDR. During the 20's and 30's anti-Semitism was rampant; right wing politicians blamed the Jews for the depression and WW1, the Klan was prominent, and Americans were hit for years with the anti-Semitic rantings of people like Father Charles Coughlin, Gerald L. K. Smith, -Disciples of Christ minister and then there was the German-American Bund. In that environment, FDR was a sane alternative. For more:

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/conte...lano-roosevelt
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2021, 05:25 PM
 
34,048 posts, read 17,064,521 times
Reputation: 17205
Quote:
Originally Posted by webster View Post
Part of the FDR legacy is that when it came to it, there were two main choices up until Pearl Harbor, the German sympathetic isolationists with anti-Semitic leanings and FDR. During the 20's and 30's anti-Semitism was rampant; right wing politicians blamed the Jews for the depression and WW1, the Klan was prominent, and Americans were hit for years with the anti-Semitic rantings of people like Father Charles Coughlin, Gerald L. K. Smith, -Disciples of Christ minister and then there was the German-American Bund. In that environment, FDR was a sane alternative. For more:

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/conte...lano-roosevelt
The Bund gave FDR an excuse if he so desired to cripple them. After the Madison Square Garden Hitler rally, the authorities should have been following every one of the 20,000 there every second, every day. (Not just the leader) .We had enough national intelligence to do just that, and it would have sent a great message to the nation.

FDR lacked the guts. Southbury, Ct did not.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tU78c7iEkkw
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2021, 07:01 PM
 
Location: New York Area
35,062 posts, read 17,006,525 times
Reputation: 30212
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNJ1960 View Post
Amen. Morse's book should be required reading in every school in the nation, btw.
Agreed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNJ1960 View Post
Truman was a rare, non Anti-Semite in the Democratic party. If only he were POTUS in 1939, there is no way IMO he would have said no to the St. Louis docking. He had a pair, unlike the POTUS he served under.
Truman was personally a bit of an anti-Semite and also prejudiced against African-Americans. He just knew right from wrong and did the right thing. FDR did not generally do the right thing. A good analogy is President Buchanan. He was personally against slavery but caved to the disunionists at every opportunity, including not security Harper's Ferry and Newport News from ultimately disloyal Virginia. Both were federal property.

Quote:
Originally Posted by webster View Post
Part of the FDR legacy is that when it came to it, there were two main choices up until Pearl Harbor, the German sympathetic isolationists with anti-Semitic leanings and FDR. During the 20's and 30's anti-Semitism was rampant; right wing politicians blamed the Jews for the depression and WW1, the Klan was prominent, and Americans were hit for years with the anti-Semitic rantings of people like Father Charles Coughlin, Gerald L. K. Smith, -Disciples of Christ minister and then there was the German-American Bund. In that environment, FDR was a sane alternative. For more:

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/conte...lano-roosevelt
Yes. And he made bad choices that did not keep us out of the war. Appeasement rarely works.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top