Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-20-2019, 05:33 AM
 
58,523 posts, read 26,824,792 times
Reputation: 14108

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by subaru5555 View Post
Uh..... The President is NOT “the TOP law enforcer”, at least not in The United States.

Just no.
Then who is?

 
Old 11-20-2019, 05:34 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,602 posts, read 44,302,488 times
Reputation: 13526
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
While true, the word “bribery” appeared once during the testimony - in a question posed by one of the attorneys asking questions. So what?
The witnesses were asked point blank during the public hearing if they would classify Trump's phone call to Zelensky as QPQ or bribery. They've all testified that they would not.
 
Old 11-20-2019, 05:35 AM
 
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
6,933 posts, read 2,369,773 times
Reputation: 5004
Quote:
Originally Posted by subaru5555 View Post
Uh..... The President is NOT “the TOP law enforcer”, at least not in The United States.

Just no.
Yes he IS, Pleiades!
 
Old 11-20-2019, 05:37 AM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,546,365 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
The witnesses were asked point blank during the public hearing if they would classify Trump's phone call to Zelensky as QPQ or bribery. They've all testified that they would not.
Fact witnesses are not in a position to decide whether the wrongdoing was committed, but rather to testify to the underlying facts. For someone who has been apoplectic about witnesses purportedly giving their opinions, I’m surprised you don’t grasp this distinction. It is an important, very basic one.
 
Old 11-20-2019, 05:41 AM
 
51,587 posts, read 25,525,472 times
Reputation: 37775
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
Fact witnesses are not in a position to decide whether the wrongdoing was committed, but rather to testify to the underlying facts. For someone who has been apoplectic about witnesses purportedly giving their opinions, I’m surprised you don’t grasp this distinction. It is an important, very basic one.
There are a lot of basic distinctions that appear difficult to grasp.
 
Old 11-20-2019, 05:41 AM
 
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
6,933 posts, read 2,369,773 times
Reputation: 5004
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
Fact witnesses are not in a position to decide whether the wrongdoing was committed, but rather to testify to the underlying facts. For someone who has been apoplectic about witnesses purportedly giving their opinions, I’m surprised you don’t grasp this distinction. It is an important, very basic one.
You twist yourself into a pretzel here every day these hearing are happening.

They testified. The answer was, and IS, NO QPQ!!!!
 
Old 11-20-2019, 05:44 AM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,546,365 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaMaj7 View Post
You twist yourself into a pretzel here every day these hearing are happening.

They testified. The answer was, and IS, NO QPQ!!!!
Maybe you missed the part where Morrison testified yesterday that the release of the aid was tied to the investigations into Biden...
 
Old 11-20-2019, 05:50 AM
 
51,587 posts, read 25,525,472 times
Reputation: 37775
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
Maybe you missed the part where Morrison testified yesterday that the release of the aid was tied to the investigations into Biden...
Technically not investigations into Biden, but the announcement of investigations into Biden.
 
Old 11-20-2019, 05:53 AM
 
51,587 posts, read 25,525,472 times
Reputation: 37775
As far as I'm aware, there still have been no investigations into Biden either by the Ukrainian government or ours.

Could it be that it is all BS, just like the "Lock her up" BS about Clinton?
 
Old 11-20-2019, 05:58 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,602 posts, read 44,302,488 times
Reputation: 13526
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
Fact witnesses are not in a position to decide whether the wrongdoing was committed, but rather to testify to the underlying facts.
Then why has their testimony mainly centered around their "feelings?" If Dems want the witnesses' "feelings" to matter, they then also have to accept their "feelings" that Trump did not commit QPQ or bribery.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top