Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The afternoon witnesses for the GOP (The GOP wanted them) did a great job.
Morrison during questioning gave out the attempted bribery (Quid Pro Quo for those who don't know).
Volker finally remembered meeting's with Sondland, VP, Pompeo, Ukrainian officials and some other's and was shocked that they would try to damage VP Biden. All the while saying if he had recognized the Quid Pro Quo sooner he would have reported it as other's have.
Sondland and Rudy being set up as the fall guy's as Trump run's and hides behind the WH twitter feed.
Once again, I am going to repeat what I said twice already and bolded above. Only in the fantasyland of blind Trump loyalists would charges automatically be dismissed because WITNESSES didn't decide on the exact legal definition for what constitutes bribery and whether or not POTUS met that definition. They aren't Constitutional lawyers. That is not their decision to make. Witnesses to a crime (or potential witnesses) do not make the decision as to the charges.
Support for this nonsense is starting to crater among independents and unless something major changes, they'll be under water in that demographic soon. People expected some kind of proof of wrongdoing, it was promised, just like with the Russia hoax there was no delivery on those promises.
Support for this nonsense is starting to crater among independents and unless something major changes, they'll be under water in that demographic soon. People expected some kind of proof of wrongdoing, it was promised, just like with the Russia hoax there was no delivery on those promises.
You put your head in the sand and yell does not hide the facts being brought out.
You put your head in the sand and yell does not hide the facts being brought out.
LOL, what "facts" are you talking about? There has been a distinct lack of "facts" in this and like I said, that's why support for this among independents is starting to crater with a 10% swing recently according to politico polling.
Bribery is not usually a direct question, it is implied but the intent is obvious. When a mobster offers a business protection and states this is a nice business it would be a shame if something happened the intent is obvious.
Amazing how Volker and Sondland's memories were refreshed.
The intended bribery or extortion in the July phone call wasn't obvious to Zelensky. He didn't even know the aid was on hold.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
