Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-20-2019, 12:34 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WannaliveinGreenville View Post
They had to pay it to the (two) jailers so they could turn their back while they did nefarious things to Epstein in prison.
While Epstein sat in a Federal Prison under the control of the DoD.

AG Barr agrees with the outcome of the first autopsy. You think he did so to protect the Clintons?

DoD is however pursuing charges against 2 detention facility employees for failing to check all prisoners and falsifying records to show they did.

There was never certainty Epstein’was going to sing or be truthful, if he did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-20-2019, 12:40 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volobjectitarian View Post
Bingo.

The purpose of the Clinton Foundation is the selling of political influence wielded by the Clintons. As of Nov, 2016, they have very little political influence to sell, thus revenue should be down.

In other news, water is wet.
The purpose of the Clinton Foundation was international charity. No question influence was used to encourage donations.

Instead of donating $100 million to the Clinton foundation, the Saudis chose to donate to an international charity fronted by Ivanka and did so in the middle of a record arms deal negotiation on Saudi soil.

Both used their positions/ influence to solicit donations. Nothing factual supports the Clintons or Ivanka personally befitted from the charities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2019, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
Most Fiscally responsible organizations would cut back on salaries, personnel and expenses.

I suspect the Foundation will continue their nice salaries until the slush fund has been reduced to zero and they can quietly close the Foundation.

Good way to pay off the Clinton supporters who are on the payroil.
Most foundations would have first and foremost cut back on their charitable programs. Instead, the CF relied on using the foundation’s accumulated capital to not cut back.

The Clinton family have never financially benefitted from the foundation.
It did not use foundation funds/ assets for campaign purposes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2019, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine View Post
Donations nosedived after hillarys lost election. Go figure.
The Saudis and other gulf states were the largest donors to the Clinton Foundation. Once she lost, she was of no use to them. Instead, the Saudis donated $100 million to anknternatiknal charity fronted by Ivanka and did so in the middle of a negotiation of a record arms deal.

Nothing factual suggests the Clintons or Ivanka personally benefitted from the charities they represented.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2019, 12:56 PM
 
Location: USA
31,061 posts, read 22,086,243 times
Reputation: 19090
Guess the 145 million the Russians gave her dried up real quick.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2019, 01:32 PM
 
45,227 posts, read 26,450,499 times
Reputation: 24985
Couldn't happen to a nicer crime family. If you're sad, lick a stamp and send a check.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2019, 02:01 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by notnamed View Post
You know that the Trump foundation just admitted to fraud right?
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinio...ow-ncna1081906

Meanwhile CharityWatch gives the Clinton Foundation an A rating.
https://www.charitywatch.org/chariti...ton-foundation


They can give them an A+ rating and extra points for extreme honesty, but it doesn't change the fact that this same organization was allowed to amend four years of tax returns instead of being charged with felony tax evasion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2019, 02:02 PM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,424,439 times
Reputation: 6409
Quote:
Originally Posted by TreeBeard View Post
Has the Clinton Charity been indicted by the State of New York for fraud as some other charities run by her political opponents?
Bingo. They enjoy deflection though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2019, 02:08 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,951 posts, read 49,198,692 times
Reputation: 55008
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
Bingo. They enjoy deflection though.
LOL... You both make a huge point that us Commoners live by a HUGE Legal Double Standard that have always kept the Clintons out of trouble. Her Political opponents would be in jail for the things they've done.

But you can blindly keep on supporting the crooks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2019, 02:12 PM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,424,439 times
Reputation: 6409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
LOL... You both make a huge point that us Commoners live by a HUGE Legal Double Standard that have always kept the Clintons out of trouble. Her Political opponents would be in jail for the things they've done.

But you can blindly keep on supporting the crooks.
How many folks have gone to jail or plead guilty that are associated with Trump in 3 years? There appears to be more on the way. Did the Clintons get banned from running a charity due to fraud? Nope. Trump is an organized crime thug.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top