Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Is the GOP about to serve up Russian propaganda to its 40% of the public for Trump’s defense?
TRANSLATION: Dem witness after Dem witness has flopped and/or admitted that he never saw or heard anything that could be construed as a "crime". They simply heard somebody else speculate on it, or "surmised" it themselves (that means they made it up). So we're going back to our old tactic of insisting that everything President Trump does comes from RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA, and hope somebody believes us somewhere.
A) No defense of the president need be made. The dems have not presented anyone who has actually witnessed a crime. You cry about "40%," but it is now universally understood that independents, especially swing state independents, have turned against proceedings, so please keep helping your party commit suicide.
B) If you want to believe the democrat party and some disgruntled civil servants, go right ahead, but we are going to have REAL hearings if this gets to the Senate, and yes, we will be talking about Ukraine's meddling.
C) I know that none of you democrat useful...err...voters, actually watched the hearings, but if you even listened to your own cherry-picked and ultimately useless non-witnesses, you would know that it is now understood that Russia meddled ON BOTH SIDES WITHOUT ANY DESIRE TO HELP TRUMP. They did so so that regardless of who won, the out party would cry foul. YOU ARE PLAYING INTO RUSSIA'S HANDS. Since you didn't watch the proceedings, you didn't know. No harm done. IF YOU CONTINUE TO DO SO, YOU ARE A TRAITOR AND RUSSIAN ASSET.
Is the GOP about to serve up Russian propaganda to its 40% of the public for Trump’s defense?
TRANSLATION: Dem witness after Dem witness has flopped and/or admitted that he never saw or heard anything that could be construed as a "crime". They simply heard somebody else speculate on it, or "surmised" it themselves (that means they made it up). So we're going back to our old tactic of insisting that everything President Trump does comes from RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA, and hope somebody believes us somewhere.
It does come from Russia as just attested to by Fiona Hill, one of the best career Russian experts we have.
Is the GOP about to serve up Russian propaganda to its 40% of the public for Trump’s defense?
TRANSLATION: Dem witness after Dem witness has flopped and/or admitted that he never saw or heard anything that could be construed as a "crime". They simply heard somebody else speculate on it, or "surmised" it themselves (that means they made it up). So we're going back to our old tactic of insisting that everything President Trump does comes from RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA, and hope somebody believes us somewhere.
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude
It does come from Russia as just attested to by Fiona Hill, one of the best career Russian experts we have.
I mean I want to think of a way where this isn’t going to happen.
Where Russia hasn’t already won.
Seek help.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
