Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm not sure why - when Ms Page herself used the phrase "demeaning fake orgasm" as THE KEY REASON she's come forward a MONTH later - we can't discuss whether Trump acted like he was having a fake orgasm. It was mocking her and Strzok, sure; but if that's what her orgasms look like, I'm sorry for Strzok and her husband. But calling it a "fake orgasm" 1,000 times won't make that the truth of what he did.
Meg Ryan did much better though the Presidents was truly funny.
That's what needs to be investigated. If they were plotting to do something as they were "talking" about it that could be conspiracy. I wonder what Strock and Page's spouses think of all this?
Like I indicated the judiciary committee already interviewed her and if the IG found something he would have made a recommendation as was the case for others. Trumps statements about her affair are undignified and childish at this point. There is no action by her, only opinion.
Trump should be the last person criticizing someone for having an affair, yet there are his rabid supporters cheering him on.
Ooh she didn't like the president or someone running for president. That is not a crime. I don't really care about her personal life but if it bothers you then you must really be bothered by Our Dear Leader who has cheated on all his wives.
Yeah but don't tell that to the Trumplettes...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl
Nope. Not liking a PResident is not a crime. Did you READ her texts? What do you think the 'insurance policy' was? What do you think Peter Strzok meant when she asked 'He's not going to PResident, is he?" and He said 'No, we'll stop it'. What do you think they meant?
We don't know. We can be sure that the FBI has dirt on every President and Presidential candidate. That is for sure. Nothing new either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamSmyth
What was her seditious act? Expressing dislike for someone running for president or the president in a private communication is not sedition.
Not sure to some it will be of course. I don't recall it being for Obama...
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan
And I would guess by extension at least half of those participating on here. Everyone is entitled to an opinion regardless. Well, if that constitution thingy is to have any influence whatsoever.
Yep I thought I noticed a tail the other day actually...
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454
Playing the victim. To be expected
And you'll tell me that Trump hasn't? He has thrown just about everyone under the bus except somehow Pence at this point. He cries "Why are they going after me, I did nothing wrong" when in reality his actions led to the investigations. Firing the FBI director because he investigated him and wouldn't sign an oath of allegiance to Trump. Wanting the whistleblower to be known.
Gosh you just don't get it. The woman set up a scheme to defraud the American people and it's not OK to call her out in public? Where honestly are your priorities?
Its ok to tear at the fabric of our nation but not to call her what she is?
I assume that means you can't answer the question.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
