Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-05-2019, 11:32 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
3,730 posts, read 1,319,696 times
Reputation: 3486

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
I sure did. And I still see no need to reinvent the wheel. Want to withdraw something you wish you had't said? Apologize. Better yet, think before you type.

Incidentally, if 75% of your friends choose to disassociate from you over a change in behavior, that's a pretty basic social clue.



Some things should be thought out before they're said. But if a comedian makes a joke about Jewish people, and then 30 years later someone who was offended by that decides to dig it up and demand this comedian be out of work over it, that's ridiculous. Also, a lot of people suddenly had an interest in politics when Trump ran for office, and suddenly felt that they couldn't be friends with anyone who went with the opposing party. What happened to the days where you could be friends with someone, regardless of their political views? When I joined a dating site a couple years ago, I noticed that people were now putting it as requirement for a potential match! "Keep scrolling if you're Republican." "If you think Trump is awesome, that means you hate life, and feel that people don't deserve to live a decent life."


Come on, give me a break!!!! Unless you're in politics for a career choice, politics don't define a person. And even then, it shouldn't fully define a politician either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-05-2019, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
3,730 posts, read 1,319,696 times
Reputation: 3486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
Gives them time to gauge the reactions and decide if they were serious or just making a joke. Why would anyone want to encourage that?



Because sometimes people react without thinking. Take a moment to see if it truly is an issue, or if you're letting your feelings cloud your logic/critical thinking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2019, 11:36 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
3,730 posts, read 1,319,696 times
Reputation: 3486
Quote:
Originally Posted by robr2 View Post
I'll agree with that but don't come b@%tching when people stop buying your product or reading your work.



He was pretty humble about it when it first happened. He did express how hurt he felt by it, and he has a right to express his feelings. He kept things under the radar for awhile. People still like Dilbert. And again, it's his creation. If he wants to make Dilbert a Republican that supports Trump, he has every right to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2019, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,250,882 times
Reputation: 19952
Quote:
Originally Posted by DK736 View Post
Because sometimes people react without thinking. Take a moment to see if it truly is an issue, or if you're letting your feelings cloud your logic/critical thinking.
Actually, it is more like some people people react without thinking. Like hotheads. I still believe if people thought before opening their mouths, they would not end up apologizing or deleting tweets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2019, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
3,730 posts, read 1,319,696 times
Reputation: 3486
A lot of good people, celebrities and non-celebs, have lost their reputation or credibility because of people looking for slip ups in the past. Look at Sarah Silverman. She pointed the race card and strutted her liberal self all over social media and went after so many people. Yet when Nick Canon uploaded footage of her making the same jokes as the same people she was trying to tear down, she fired back at him and said he was violating her freedom of speech. Funny how the rules stop applying when the whistle blower is the one being called out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2019, 07:12 PM
 
9,329 posts, read 4,138,210 times
Reputation: 8224
The 48-hour rule is an interesting idea, but it would seem to open the door to people saying horrendous things, and then if there's bad blowback to pretend they didn't mean it. "Ha ha - joke!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2019, 07:27 PM
 
46,943 posts, read 25,964,420 times
Reputation: 29434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
The 48-hour rule is an interesting idea, but it would seem to open the door to people saying horrendous things, and then if there's bad blowback to pretend they didn't mean it. "Ha ha - joke!"
Yep. To (mis0quote a great German poet, "The intention which comes to light is a disconcerting one."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2019, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Caribou, Me.
6,928 posts, read 5,900,569 times
Reputation: 5251
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
We have a 48-hour rule already. It's called an "apology".

Of course, that involves admitting you're wrong and taking responsibility for your words and actions. If that's too much for Scott Adams' ego, then he can either shut up or deal with the consequences of what he says.
That’s what Adams said. Did you not read the OP??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2019, 12:10 PM
 
Location: *
13,242 posts, read 4,919,895 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by DK736 View Post
He was pretty humble about it when it first happened. He did express how hurt he felt by it, and he has a right to express his feelings. He kept things under the radar for awhile. People still like Dilbert. And again, it's his creation. If he wants to make Dilbert a Republican that supports Trump, he has every right to.
What was he feeling 'hurt' about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2019, 11:15 AM
 
46,943 posts, read 25,964,420 times
Reputation: 29434
Quote:
Originally Posted by maineguy8888 View Post
That’s what Adams said.
Adams said that his 48-hour rule was a dumb idea because we already had the concept of an apology?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top